2011
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.25868
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Glucose, not glutamine, is the dominant energy source required for proliferation and survival of head and neck squamous carcinoma cells

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Tumor metabolism is an essential contributor to disease progression and response to treatment. An understanding of the metabolic phenotype of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) will allow the development of appropriate antimetabolic strategies for this tumor type. METHODS: A panel of 15 HNSCC cell lines was assayed for glucose and glutamine dependence and sensitivity to metabolic inhibitors. In addition, broad-spectrum metabolomic analysis using mass spectrometry/liquid chromatography wa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

10
129
2
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 120 publications
(143 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
(62 reference statements)
10
129
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…To a certain extent, our results also confirm the observation that glucose, not glutamine, is the dominant energy source required for the proliferation and survival of HN-SCC cells. 22 On the other hand, the induction of SLC1A5 by 10058-F4 is consistent with the results of other authors who showed an elevated expression of this transporter as a response to c-MYC inhibition in human P-493 B lymphoma and PC3 prostate cancer cells. 12,23 However, the mechanism which leads to the decrease in ammonia production is elusive since it cannot be explained by changes in the gene expression level alone.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To a certain extent, our results also confirm the observation that glucose, not glutamine, is the dominant energy source required for the proliferation and survival of HN-SCC cells. 22 On the other hand, the induction of SLC1A5 by 10058-F4 is consistent with the results of other authors who showed an elevated expression of this transporter as a response to c-MYC inhibition in human P-493 B lymphoma and PC3 prostate cancer cells. 12,23 However, the mechanism which leads to the decrease in ammonia production is elusive since it cannot be explained by changes in the gene expression level alone.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…21 A better understanding of tumor metabolism in HNSCCs may provide new therapeutic strategies for the treatment of this type of cancer. The data on the regulation of energetic metabolism in HNSCCs, although limited, 22 suggests that head and neck cancer cell proliferation depends on glucose and glutamine metabolism. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of small molecules -inhibitors of specific regulators of both c-MYC inhibitor (10058-F4) and HIF-1 inhibitor (KG-548) pathways -on the proliferation and metabolism of the hypopharyngeal carcinoma FaDu cells.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2-DG treatment increased the PPP metabolites in both cell lines. After entering the cell, 2-DG is phosphorylated by hexokinase to form 2-DG-6-phosphate, which cannot be further metabolized, and its accumulation leads to inhibition of the glycolytic pathway and shunting through the PPP (5,14,15). This PPP flux augments the generation of NADPH by glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G-6-PDH).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since then, several reports have shown that glutamine may be used as the energy fuel for cancer cells (42)(43)(44)(45). In contrast to glucose, glutamine as an energy fuel is only observed in a few cancer cell lines (27) and plays an important role in compensating for the shortage of glucose in some cases.…”
Section: Certain Cancer Cells May Use Glutamine As Energy Fuelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lactate is converted to pyruvate by LDH-B and then enters the mitochondria for OXPHOS to generate ATP (3,14,22,(25)(26)(27)(28). Metabolic symbiosis is not cancer-specific.…”
Section: Glycolysis Versus Oxphosmentioning
confidence: 99%