1988
DOI: 10.1246/cl.1988.1183
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Glucose Oxidase-Modified SnO2 Electrode as Electrochemical Glucose Sensor

Abstract: Glucose oxidase was chemically immobilized on an SnO2 electrode via 1) 2,4,6-trichloro-1,3,5-triazine, 2) 3-aminopropyltriethoxysilane and glutaraldehyde, or 3) crosslinkage of enzyme molecules by glutaraldehyde. These enzyme-immobilized electrodes were compared regarding the performance as amperometric glucose sensors.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 5 depicts the performance of the bienzyme electrode as a glucose sensor. In comparison with the GOx monolayer-modified electrode described in a previous work (9), the present sensor exhibits about 10-fold higher sensitivity, 50-fold lower detection limit, and 6-fold faster response. This is in line with the acceleration of hydrogen peroxide redox processes, which are slow on a bare tin oxide electrode (Figure 2).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 59%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Figure 5 depicts the performance of the bienzyme electrode as a glucose sensor. In comparison with the GOx monolayer-modified electrode described in a previous work (9), the present sensor exhibits about 10-fold higher sensitivity, 50-fold lower detection limit, and 6-fold faster response. This is in line with the acceleration of hydrogen peroxide redox processes, which are slow on a bare tin oxide electrode (Figure 2).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…In most of our previous works (9)(10)(11) hydrogen peroxide generated by glucose oxidation was directly oxidized on a tin oxide electrode. The high overpotential for direct oxidation of hydrogen peroxide necessitated sensor operation at +800 to +900 mV vs Ag/AgCI, so that electroactive substances present as impurities in samples are liable to interfere with the assay.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Briefly, 2.5 mg BSA and 0.5 mg enzyme (GOD or ADH) were dissolved in 50 mL phosphate buffer solution (PBS, 0.05 M, pH 7.4), and then 5 mL glutaraldehyde (5%) was added to get a homogenous mixture. Finally, 5 mL of the mixture was dropped onto the surface of the OMCE (or CNTE and GPE) with a microsyringe and allowed the enzyme film to dry and solidification in the shady and cool conditions [32]. The resulting bioelectrodes were abbreviated as OMC/ GOD, CNT/GOD, and GP/GOD for GOD based electrodes and OMC/ADH, CNT/ADH, and GP/ADH for ADH based ones.…”
Section: Electrode Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several techniques have been used to immobilize biologically active molecules within or on polymer-based devices. These include retention by adsorption at solid interfaces, cross-linking of the enzyme to a support or to other enzymes with bifunctional agents, physical retention within polymeric matrixes, and covalent or ionic binding to functionalized supports. While these methods have been used successfully, significant difficulties may be encountered during implementation. For example, harsh synthetic conditions required for immobilization may lead to enzyme degradation, the enzyme immobilization matrix may lead to slow substrate mass transfer, and leaching of the enzyme results in sensor drift. Another difficulty involves low capacity of the host for the enzyme.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%