2007
DOI: 10.1534/genetics.106.068932
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Glucose-Responsive Regulators of Gene Expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Function at the Nuclear Periphery via a Reverse Recruitment Mechanism

Abstract: Regulation of gene transcription is a key feature of developmental, homeostatic, and oncogenic processes. The reverse recruitment model of transcriptional control postulates that eukaryotic genes become active by moving to contact transcription factories at nuclear substructures; our previous work showed that at least some of these factories are tethered to nuclear pores. We demonstrate here that the nuclear periphery is the site of key events in the regulation of glucose-repressed genes, which together compos… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
64
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
4
64
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A role for Nup2p in the perinuclear localization of actively transcribing GAL loci has previously been described (Schmid et al 2006). The perinuclear localization of the GAL transcription sites, as well as those for KHK1 and INO1, has also been correlated with an increase in the transcription of these genes (Brickner and Walter 2004;Schmid et al 2006;Taddei et al 2006;Sarma et al 2007), lending support to the view that the NPC basket affects the process of gene expression.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…A role for Nup2p in the perinuclear localization of actively transcribing GAL loci has previously been described (Schmid et al 2006). The perinuclear localization of the GAL transcription sites, as well as those for KHK1 and INO1, has also been correlated with an increase in the transcription of these genes (Brickner and Walter 2004;Schmid et al 2006;Taddei et al 2006;Sarma et al 2007), lending support to the view that the NPC basket affects the process of gene expression.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Nup42p could also facilitate association of the NPC with target genes. Several yeast genes associate with the nuclear pore upon induction (Brickner and Walter 2004;Casolari et al 2004Casolari et al , 2005Dieppois et al 2006;Schmid et al 2006;Taddei et al 2006;Brickner et al 2007;Sarma et al 2007;Tan-Wong et al 2009), which may promote transcriptional looping and/or couple transcription and mRNA export from the nucleus (Brickner 2009;Hampsey et al 2011). Upon initial inositol starvation, INO1 translocation to the nuclear periphery is dependent on Nup42p (Ahmed et al 2010;Light et al 2010); while initial translocation is independent of Nup100p [but perhaps amplified in its absence (Ahmed et al 2010)], Nup100p is required for persistent peripheral localization and transcriptional memory of INO1 after inositol repletion .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has also been proposed that gene localization within the nucleus is sometimes regulated in response to regulatory signals (Menon et al 2005;Sarma et al 2007). According to this model, genes and their associated activators move to the nuclear periphery where they encounter the transcriptional machinery at nuclear pore complexes.…”
Section: Functions Of Tf-dna Bindingmentioning
confidence: 99%