2020
DOI: 10.2140/pjm.2020.304.629
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gluing Bartnik extensions, continuity of the Bartnik mass, and the equivalence of definitions

Abstract: In the context of the Bartnik mass, there are two fundamentally different notions of an extension of some compact Riemannian manifold (Ω, γ) with boundary. In one case, the extension is taken to be a manifold without boundary in which (Ω, γ) embeds isometrically, and in the other case the extension is taken to be a manifold with boundary where the boundary data is determined by ∂Ω.We give a type of convexity condition under which we can say both of these types of extensions indeed yield the same value for the … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, this does not directly imply lower semi-continuity of the Bartnik mass: the main difficulty is that it is not known that "close" Bartnik data necessarily have "close" competitors for near-minimal mass extensions. Note that the recent work of McCormick [42] on the continuity of the Bartnik mass does not apply here -the regions we consider will not generally satisfy the required convexity condition in [42,Theorem 5.1].…”
Section: Proof Of Theorem 12mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, this does not directly imply lower semi-continuity of the Bartnik mass: the main difficulty is that it is not known that "close" Bartnik data necessarily have "close" competitors for near-minimal mass extensions. Note that the recent work of McCormick [42] on the continuity of the Bartnik mass does not apply here -the regions we consider will not generally satisfy the required convexity condition in [42,Theorem 5.1].…”
Section: Proof Of Theorem 12mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both of these versions have previously appeared in the literature. For further discussion on the numerous variations in the definition of Bartnik mass, and some progress on reconciling them, see [32], [42]. These three definitions, based on (1.1)-(1.3), all require a precise choice among the various possible definitions of horizon.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The continuity and differentiability of the Bartnik mass is another challenging question that remains to be rigorously analyzed. In the time-symmetric setting, partial results on the continuity of the Barntnik mass has been given by the first-named author [15]. In the general case, existence and smooth dependence of stationary vacuum extensions of boundary data close to a round sphere in the Minkowski spacetime R 3,1 has been recently obtained by Z.…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shortly before this paper was posted to the arXiv, S. McCormick posted [25] to the arXiv, which is on a very similar topic but uses different techniques. In particular, Theorem 3.3 therein corresponds with Theorem 2 above.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%