2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2011.01.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gluon density and functions from BK equation with local impact parameter dependence in DIS on nuclei

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[124]). An impact-parameter dependence was also introduced [125][126][127] that was already missing in the GBW model.…”
Section: Dipole Models and Geometric Scalingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[124]). An impact-parameter dependence was also introduced [125][126][127] that was already missing in the GBW model.…”
Section: Dipole Models and Geometric Scalingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The solution of the nonlinear evolution equation for the high energy factorizable unintegrated gluon density enters for example the formula for the proton structure function, which at leading α s ln(1/x) reads: The impact factors S T , and S L are obtained as matrix elements from the process γ * + g * → q q with inclusion of appropriate phase space factors, the sum runs over quark flavours. In the massless case the full impact factor reads (see also [19] for massive case):…”
Section: Nonlinear Equation For High Energy Factorizable Unintegratedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this model the gluon density falls too fast at large k 2 as compared to perturabative QCD pattern but nevertheless it models quite well bulk properties of physics of saturation. It has also correct asymptotics and is frequently used as initial distributions for evolution equations [19,32]. Applying the formula (A.3) to F(x, k 2 ) = NcS ⊥ 2π 2 αs k 2 /Q 2 s (x)e −k 2 /Q 2 s (x) we obtain Φ(x, k 2 ) = S ⊥ 2 Γ(0, k 2 /Q 2 s ) (A.7)…”
Section: Jhep12(2012)033mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[130]). An impact-parameter dependence was also introduced [131][132][133] that was already missing in the GBW model.…”
Section: Dipole Models and Geometric Scalingmentioning
confidence: 99%