Glutamate (Glu) immunocytochemistry has been widely used to identify presumed gluergic neurons and synapses, but several problems related to the fact that Glu is both a synaptic transmitter and a compound used for metabolic purposes are d unsolved. One of these concerns the intease perikarllal staining observed in perfusion-fued tissue. Phosphateactivated glutaminase, a key enzyme for the synthesis of releasable glutamate, is inhibited by the diazoketone 6-diazo-5-oxo-~-norleucine (DON), which greatly reduces glutamate release. In the ptesent experiments, DON was either injected intraparenchymally or applied epipially to the sensorimotor cortex of adult Sprague-Dawley rats at concentrations of 0.25-1 mM. Both intrapenchymal and epipial applications of the chemical abolished Glu immunoreactivity in neuron
IntroductionThe acidic amino acid glutamate (Glu) is the major excitatory neurotransmitter in the mammalian brain (Shank and Aprison, 1988;Fonnum, 1984) and has been implicated in diverse physiological and pathological processes, such as developmental and use-dependent plasticity, long-term potentiation, neurotoxicity, and degenerative disorders (Meldrum and Garthwaite, 1990;Choi, 1988;Artola and Singer, 1987, 1989;Bear et al., 1987). Understanding of the mechanisms by which Glu plays its role in these processes requires not only the detailed knowledge of the postsynaptic receptors implicated and of the biochemical events that follow the interaction between Glu and its receptors but also the identification of presynaptic neurons and axon terminals.A major advance in the persistent search for an anatomic method capable of visualizing glutamatergic (Glu-ergic) neurons and synapses occurred in 1983, when it was shown that neurons and axon terminals containing high levels of Glu could be studied by using immunocytochemical techniques (Storm-Mathisen et al., 1983 This approach has since become widely used to study the chemical anatomy of presumptive Glu-ergic neurons, synapses, and pathways in many central nervous system (CNS) structures (for review see Petrusz and Rustioni, 1989). Several studies have now clearly established that both pre-and post-embedding electron microscopy of sections immunocytochemically stained with anti-Glu sera are reliable tools for studying Glu-ergic axon terminals (DeBiasi and Rustioni, 1990;Conti et al., 1989;Dori et al., 1989;DeFelipe et al., 1988;Ottersen, 1987Ottersen, ,1989. However, the suitability of Glu immunostaining as a reliable indicator of Glu-ergic neurons is a subject of considerable debate, since the main light microscopic feature of pre-embedding Glu immunostaining of perfusion-fixed tissue is the presence of intense perikaryal labeling (e.g., Conti et al., 1987a;Ottersen and Storm-Mathisen, 1984), an observation that is apparently hardly reconcilable with the widely accepted notion that transmitter Glu is synthesized at the nerve terminal (Fonnum, 1991). In their review, Petrusz and Rustioni (1989) wrote: "It seems prudent to regard strong and consistent staining in neu...