2021
DOI: 10.1093/jn/nxaa387
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gluten Intake and All-Cause and Cause-Specific Mortality: Prospective Findings from the UK Biobank

Abstract: Background Gluten has been linked to adverse effects on metabolic and vascular health. Objectives The present study determines the association between dietary gluten intake and all-cause (primary objective), as well as cause-specific, mortality in people without celiac disease. Methods Gluten intake was estimated in 159,265 participants of the UK Biobank whic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present study, we aimed to determine the average daily intake of gluten in subjects with IBS, and to investigate the association between severity of GI symptoms and gluten intake. Our data show that the intake of gluten in IBS is similar to the reported average intake in Western countries [16,18,19]. IBS subjects that eat lower amounts of gluten were found to have more severe GI symptoms and less caloric intake.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In the present study, we aimed to determine the average daily intake of gluten in subjects with IBS, and to investigate the association between severity of GI symptoms and gluten intake. Our data show that the intake of gluten in IBS is similar to the reported average intake in Western countries [16,18,19]. IBS subjects that eat lower amounts of gluten were found to have more severe GI symptoms and less caloric intake.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…in a geographical nearby location [19]. Furthermore, our observation that males (16.2 (11.5e18.8)) have a higher intake of gluten compared with females (10.3 (7.3e13.2)) is in line with the UK (11.7 (8.1e15.9) compared with 8.2 (5.2e11.6) g/ day respectively) [18] and Danish data (12.0 ± 4.6 compared with 9.0 ± 3.4 g/day respectively) [19], but we report a somewhat more pronounced difference. A possible factor that could explain this difference is the small sample size of males in our study, only 31 out of 147 subjects.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 59%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Statistical analyses have been described recently [18,19]. In brief, the statistical software R version 3.6.3 [20] together with add-on packages was used to analyze the data.…”
Section: Statistical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%