2021
DOI: 10.1007/s13410-021-00968-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Glycemic control among children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes during COVID-19 pandemic in Egypt: a pilot study

Abstract: Background The COVID-19 pandemic and the consequences of lockdown significantly impacted glycemic control. Aim To evaluate the impact of the pandemic and lockdown on glycemic control among Egyptian children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes. Methods Cross-sectional study conducted through an online questionnaire. The participants were patients with type 1 diabetes and/or their caregivers Results A total of 115 valid responses to the questionnaire were received. During the lockdown, almost 64% of patients sh… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On this matter, the majority of the included studies focused on evaluating the impact of Covid-19 on medical indices among adolescents with T1DM. In general, they underlined a stable and even improved TIR and HbA1c pre-, during and post-lockdown (29)(30)(31)34), except for one study that showed a downward trend of glycemic control pre-and post-lockdown (32). Another relevant result that emerged was the reduction in physical CGM, Continuous Glucose Monitoring; GMI, Glucose monitoring Index; LBGI, Low Blood Glucose Index; HBGI, High Blood Glucose Index; SMBG, Self-monitoring of blood glucose; TIR, Time in Range; TAR, Time Above Range; TBR, Time Below Range.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On this matter, the majority of the included studies focused on evaluating the impact of Covid-19 on medical indices among adolescents with T1DM. In general, they underlined a stable and even improved TIR and HbA1c pre-, during and post-lockdown (29)(30)(31)34), except for one study that showed a downward trend of glycemic control pre-and post-lockdown (32). Another relevant result that emerged was the reduction in physical CGM, Continuous Glucose Monitoring; GMI, Glucose monitoring Index; LBGI, Low Blood Glucose Index; HBGI, High Blood Glucose Index; SMBG, Self-monitoring of blood glucose; TIR, Time in Range; TAR, Time Above Range; TBR, Time Below Range.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More specifically, N = 4 studies (29)(30)(31)34) reported the Time in Range (TIR), comprising also the Time Above Range (TAR) and the Time Below Range (TBR) which were reported by N = 3 (30,31,34) studies. Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) was instead reported by N=6 studies (29,(31)(32)(33)(34)(35), with N = 2 studies also reporting information about the Glucose Management Indicator (GMI) (30,31) representing the estimates A1c (eA1c). The Low and High Blood Glucose Indices (LBGI and HBGI, respectively) were reported by N = 2 studies (29,31), while the Mean Glucose by N = 3 studies (29,31,34); of these, N = 2 (29, 31) also provided the sample's glucose SD.…”
Section: Studies' Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This meta-analysis showed that HbA1c and mean glucose levels were lower before than after the pandemic era. Lockdown in the pandemic era hurts glycemic control in T1DM children (Elhenawy and Eltonbary, 2021), especially 10-13 years of age. 7 However, the severity of T1DM also increases during the pandemic era (Kostopoulou et al, 2021 andMc-Glacken-Bryne et al, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pandemic resulted in fewer number of hospital visits due to the recommendations on social isolation and travel restrictions, loss of the traditional method of communication with the patient, impaired routine diabetic care, and absences of telehealth services. Previous studies have shown that the pandemic resulted in poor glycemic control and increasing incidence of diabetes complications ( Elhenawy and Eltonbary, 2021 ; Kshanti et al, 2021 ; Önmez et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%