2018
DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2018.01609
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Glycemic Threshold as an Alternative Method to Identify the Anaerobic Threshold in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes

Abstract: Purpose: To analyze the agreement between the velocity, heart rate, and oxygen uptake values corresponding to second ventilatory threshold and glycemic threshold in patients with type 2 diabetes.Methods: Twenty-four untrained patients (55.1 ± 8.9 years) were evaluated. Three different parameters of training intensity corresponding to anaerobic threshold, one mechanical (velocity) and two physiological (heart rate and oxygen uptake) parameters, were identified by a classical method (second ventilatory threshold… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the present study presents the finding that the phenomenon is also observable during a CPET, which consists of a stress assessment, is more applied in clinical settings, and can be used in populations with comorbid conditions [11]. In this sense, these findings make the GT method more accessible.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore, the present study presents the finding that the phenomenon is also observable during a CPET, which consists of a stress assessment, is more applied in clinical settings, and can be used in populations with comorbid conditions [11]. In this sense, these findings make the GT method more accessible.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…However, in this present study, the blood glucose analysis was carried out using expensive equipment. Despite this, other investigations employed measures with portable equipment showing reliable [27,11].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation