2021
DOI: 10.1002/tcr.202000181
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Glycosylation and Protecting Group Strategies Towards the Synthesis of Saponins and Bacterial Oligosaccharides: A Personal Account

Abstract: Carbohydrates and their conjugates are not only involved in important biological processes but are also regarded as promising therapeutics and prophylactics. Over the last century, several glycosylation methodologies, glycosyl donors, and protecting groups have been developed and some of them have found broad synthetic applications in carbohydrate chemistry. In this Personal Account, we describe how glycosylation and protecting group strategies have been implemented in our as well as in other research groups a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 129 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These protecting groups significantly affect the reactivity of the glycosyl donors and the nucleophile [25,33] . While all C−O bonds are destabilizing to formation of an electrophilic center at the anomeric carbon, ester‐type protecting groups tend to be more destabilizing than ether‐type groups [34–41] . Protecting groups can change the intermediate conformation through steric impedance or neighboring and remote interaction, thereby regulating the reactivity and stereoselectivity of the glycosylation reaction [42–45] .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These protecting groups significantly affect the reactivity of the glycosyl donors and the nucleophile [25,33] . While all C−O bonds are destabilizing to formation of an electrophilic center at the anomeric carbon, ester‐type protecting groups tend to be more destabilizing than ether‐type groups [34–41] . Protecting groups can change the intermediate conformation through steric impedance or neighboring and remote interaction, thereby regulating the reactivity and stereoselectivity of the glycosylation reaction [42–45] .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[25,33] While all CÀ O bonds are destabilizing to formation of an electrophilic center at the anomeric carbon, ester-type protecting groups tend to be more destabilizing than ether-type groups. [34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41] Protecting groups can change the intermediate conformation through steric impedance or neighboring and remote interaction, thereby regulating the reactivity and stereoselectivity of the glycosylation reaction. [42][43][44][45] A clear relation between activation temperature, glycosyl donor reactivity, and protecting groups remains to be defined.…”
Section: Structural Influence On Activation Of Glycosyl Donorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This disadvantage can be solved by designing and preparing suitable derivatives with enhanced pharmacological activity and bioavailability in comparison with the parent plant triterpenoids, as reviewed recently [ 3 ]. In natural resources, all triterpenoids mostly appear as aglycones in triterpenoid saponins that may be considered glycoconjugates [ 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%