2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2017.06.041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Glyoxal and methylglyoxal as urinary markers of diabetes. Determination using a dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction procedure combined with gas chromatography–mass spectrometry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the exhaustive paper, all the points of the developed protocol are described in detail and critically discussed. Pastor-Belda et al (2017) proposed an alternative method for G and MG measurements in urine samples. The sample preparation procedure consisted on salting-out assisted liquid-liquid extraction and dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction combined with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS).…”
Section: E Glycation Processes In Cultured Cells Animalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the exhaustive paper, all the points of the developed protocol are described in detail and critically discussed. Pastor-Belda et al (2017) proposed an alternative method for G and MG measurements in urine samples. The sample preparation procedure consisted on salting-out assisted liquid-liquid extraction and dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction combined with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS).…”
Section: E Glycation Processes In Cultured Cells Animalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 4 summarize the analytical aspects of the proposed and the previously reported methods for analysis of α-DCs in biological fluids. In addition to the selectivity problem that was discussed previously, the reported methods suffered from several drawbacks including; long derivatization time (120-1440 min) [12][13][14][15]21], relatively large sample volumes (0.2-5 mL) [10][11][12][13]17,[19][20][21] and the use of complicated multistep extraction procedures [10][11][12][13]17,18]. On the other hand, the developed method needs only 30 min for completion of the derivatization reaction, used very small sample volume (0.025 mL) which compares only to the previously reported LC-MS/MS methods [14,16] which used expensive instrumentations that are not available in many laboratories, as well, the extraction of α-DCs from human serum was carried out using simple PPT procedure with very good recovery (91-105%).…”
Section: Comparison Of the Newly Developed Approach For Determinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2006, a summary for the reported analytical methods for the determination of α-DCs in different matrices was reported by Shibamoto [4]. In the last ten years, many methods were reported for determination of α-DCs in biological fluids including: Gas chromatographic methods with flame ionization detection (GC-FID) [10,11] or with mass spectrometric detection (GC-MS) [12,13] and liquid chromatography with tandem MS (LC-MS/MS) [14][15][16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…High levels of MGO occur when the concentrations of its precursors are elevated, for instance, during hyperglycemia (Allaman et al, 2015). Compared to healthy individuals, two-to four-fold higher levels of MGO is found in the plasma and urine diabetic patients (Odani et al, 1999;Lu et al, 2011;Senda et al, 2015;Pastor-Belda et al, 2017). MGO is one of the most potent glycating agents and is a potential precursor of advanced glycation end products (AGEs), which have been proposed as an important mechanism contributing to the pathophysiology of several complications in diabetes (Shamsaldeen et al, 2016;Hanssen et al, 2018), including diabetic nephropathy (Hanssen et al, 2019) and vascular dysfunction (Brouwers et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%