2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2017.06.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Glyphosate and AMPA, “pseudo-persistent” pollutants under real-world agricultural management practices in the Mesopotamic Pampas agroecosystem, Argentina

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

11
114
5
16

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 229 publications
(146 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
11
114
5
16
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the transport of this herbicide to the atmosphere is also produced by vaporization of droplets during local or surrounding applications; for this reason, glyphosate may be present in stormwater runoff, with an average of 2.9 μg L −1 (Lamprea & Ruban, ). Due to their continuous introduction into the environment, glyphosate and AMPA can be considered as ‘pseudo‐persistent’ pollutants (Primost, Marino, Aparicio, Costa, & Carriquiriborde, ), which may be able to cause the same exposure potential as regulated persistent pollutants, as their high transformation and removal rates can be compensated by their continuous input into the environment.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the transport of this herbicide to the atmosphere is also produced by vaporization of droplets during local or surrounding applications; for this reason, glyphosate may be present in stormwater runoff, with an average of 2.9 μg L −1 (Lamprea & Ruban, ). Due to their continuous introduction into the environment, glyphosate and AMPA can be considered as ‘pseudo‐persistent’ pollutants (Primost, Marino, Aparicio, Costa, & Carriquiriborde, ), which may be able to cause the same exposure potential as regulated persistent pollutants, as their high transformation and removal rates can be compensated by their continuous input into the environment.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In CH, the concentrations in the collected material will depend mainly on the predominant directions of the winds and the existence of input of material from other plots. In particles dissolved in water (material eroded by water from soils in crop production), the maximum glyphosate and AMPA concentrations were 562.8 and 210.4 μg kg −1 (Aparicio et al, ), and 548 and 475 μg kg −1 , respectively (Primost et al, ). In our study, the wind‐blown material or eroded material transported by the wind has average concentrations of 348 and 418 μg kg −1 for glyphosate and AMPA, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been concluded that glyphosate and AMPA often occur as run-off from fields originating from glyphosate-based herbicide application. These residues not only became ubiquitous or "pseudo-persistent" contaminants in surface water, in periods with increasing concentrations over the years (McKnight et al, 2015;Carvalho, 2017;Primost et al, 2017), but through surface waters they were shown to be able to reach the seas as well, as documented in Germany in the estuaries of the Baltic Sea (Skeff et al, 2015). Glyphosate and AMPA were also found at up to 2.5 and 0.48 µg/l in rain and up to 9.1 and 0.97 ng/m 3 in air, respectively in the USA in Mississippi, Iowa and Indiana States in 2004(Chang et al, 2011, where both have been identified in the same period as common surface water contaminants near agricultural fields (Majewski et al, 2014).…”
Section: Exposure To Glyphosate-environmental and Food Analysis Humamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although GlyBH use is almost limited to terrestrial application, information regarding occurrence and cumulative and/or background levels of glyphosate residues in soils have received less attention, especially at the European scale. In fact, despite some recent studies on the distribution of glyphosate and AMPA in soils from Argentina (e.g., Aparicio et al, 2013;Lupi et al, 2015;Primost et al, 2017), U.S.A. (e.g., Battaglin et al, 2014;Scribner et al, 2007) or Australia (e.g., Todorovic et al, 2013), in Europe, where the approval for GlyBH use will be decided by the end of 2017, information on occurrence and levels of these substances in soil is still very limited and out of date (Grunewald et al, 2001;Laitinen et al, 2006Laitinen et al, , 2007Laitinen et al, , 2009.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%