2017
DOI: 10.3390/molecules22111891
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Glypre: In Silico Prediction of Protein Glycation Sites by Fusing Multiple Features and Support Vector Machine

Abstract: Glycation is a non-enzymatic process occurring inside or outside the host body by attaching a sugar molecule to a protein or lipid molecule. It is an important form of post-translational modification (PTM), which impairs the function and changes the characteristics of the proteins so that the identification of the glycation sites may provide some useful guidelines to understand various biological functions of proteins. In this study, we proposed an accurate prediction tool, named Glypre, for lysine glycation. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(46 reference statements)
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among other recent methods, the webservers for glycation, PreGly [40] and iProtGly-SS [42] were not functional when accessed to test their method. In addition, the published codes for Glypre [41] could not be executed in the absence of a guide. Both Glypre and iProtGly-SS employed GlyPse-AAC data for training their classifier and used GlyNN data as comparator dataset.…”
Section: Comparison With Benchmark Prediction Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Among other recent methods, the webservers for glycation, PreGly [40] and iProtGly-SS [42] were not functional when accessed to test their method. In addition, the published codes for Glypre [41] could not be executed in the absence of a guide. Both Glypre and iProtGly-SS employed GlyPse-AAC data for training their classifier and used GlyNN data as comparator dataset.…”
Section: Comparison With Benchmark Prediction Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They have considered features from position-specific amino acid propensity (PSAAP) scheme. More recently, Zhao et al proposed Glypre predictor [41] using a combination of features like position conservation, amino acid index and CKSAAP. In addition, Islam et al [42] investigated an even larger set of features that included propensity based features, amino acid composition, physicochemical features and secondary structure motifs for their predictor iProtGly-SS.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CKSAAP reflects the short-range interactions of residues within the sequence surrounding the PTM site. [52,60,95,96] LC For the sites located in the N-terminal, C-terminal or the middle of a sequence, LC used 3-bit binary to encode this terminal information, i.e. N-terminal for (1, 0, 0), C-terminal for (0, 0, 1) and middle for (0, 1, 0).…”
Section: Cksaapmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stand-alone tools are available for KA-predictor [52], Glycation sites Predictor (Glypre) [96], PMeS [119], GPS-MSP [48], SUMOsp [76], UbPred [123], CKSAAP UbSite [60], UbiProber [98] and hCKSAAP UbSite [61]-all of which are reviewed in this study. Providing detailed software installation instructions, with information about dependencies and runtime environment, is therefore strongly suggested, especially considering that it is generally challenging for biologists to use these stand-alone tools on their local machines.…”
Section: Spcmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, machine learning algorithms were adopted to train models. The published predictors about seven types of lysine modified sites are as follows: (1) Acetylation: NetAcet [ 2 ], PAIL [ 3 ], BRABSB-PHKA [ 4 ], PSKAcePred [ 5 ], LAceP [ 6 ], N-Ace [ 7 ], ASEB [ 8 ], ProAcePred [ 9 ] and DeepAcet [ 10 ]; (2) Glycation: GlyNN [ 11 ], PreGly [ 12 ], Gly-PseAAC [ 13 ], Glypre [ 14 ], BPB_GlySite [ 15 ], and iProtGly-SS [ 16 ]; (3) Succinylation: SucPred [ 17 ], iSuc-PseAAC [ 18 ], iSuc-PseOpt [ 19 ], SuccFind [ 20 ], SuccinSite [ 21 ], pSuc-Lys [ 22 ], SSEvol-Suc [ 23 ], and PSuccE [ 24 ]; (4) Ubiquitination: UbPred [ 25 ], CKSAAP_UbSite [ 26 ], UbiProber [ 27 ], UbiNet [ 28 ] and DeepUbi [ 29 ]; (5) SUMO: SUMOpre [ 30 ], SUMmOn [ 31 ] and seeSUMO [ 32 ]; (6) Methylation: AutoMotif Server [ 33 ], MASA [ 34 ], and PSSMe [ 35 ]; (7) Malonylation: MaloPred [ 36 ] and Mal-Lys [ 37 ]. However, these tools cannot implement classification of all potential lysine modified PTMs, only focusing on a single type, which limits the possibility of mining more information and ignores the interconnections of multiple PTMs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%