2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10291-017-0690-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

GNSS receiver implementations to mitigate the effects of commensurate sampling frequencies on DLL code tracking

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Solving for the timing parameter usually requires a feedback timing framework [8], [12], [16], [22], [24], as shown in Fig.2. In this figure, the ''TED parameter acquisition'' block is used to acquire parameters, which must be calculated before the timing error detector (TED).…”
Section: System Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Solving for the timing parameter usually requires a feedback timing framework [8], [12], [16], [22], [24], as shown in Fig.2. In this figure, the ''TED parameter acquisition'' block is used to acquire parameters, which must be calculated before the timing error detector (TED).…”
Section: System Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In digital implementation, both the code phase discriminator and the subcarrier phase discriminator in the DEL are affected by sampling distortion. Many studies have focused on the impact of sampling distortion on the code phase discriminator [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][18][19][20][21][22], while only a few of them study of the digital subcarrier phase discriminator.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To eliminate this distortion, Quirk proposed a noncommensurate sampling method that can efficiently improve the resolution of the digital correlation curve [8]. In addition, Jin and Tran proposed a method based on phase jitter, which can further improve the phase resolution [20,21]. When phase resolution is enhanced, the zero-bias effect is highlighted [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a traditional early minus later (E − L) code phase discriminator, the distortion error caused by sampling is called the zero-bias error [1]. There are two reasons for a zero-bias: (i) the phase estimation is blurred due to insufficient phase resolution of the digital code [2,3]; (ii) the deviation of the E − L discriminator is due to the asymmetry of the digital autocorrelation curve [4,5]. Non-commensurate sampling [1] can improve the phase resolution of the spread spectrum signal, in the relevant domain, by designing a non-commensurate sampling frequency with the spreading code rate.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where c(•) represents the received signal andc(•) represents the spreading code reference waveform. According to the analysis in [3], when the gate wave of the code reference waveform is symmetric about the signal flip point, the zerobias of the code phase discriminator is the smallest. However, in cases where the initial code phase is uncertain, ensuring that each gate wave of the digital code reference waveform is symmetric about the flipped edge of the received signal is a crucial step.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%