2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.asr.2015.07.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

GNSS zenith delays and gradients in the analysis of VLBI Intensive sessions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
15
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
3
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Boehm et al (2010) showed that the use of a priori values from direct raytracing or linear horizontal gradients on the TsukubaWettzell baseline (INT2) did not significantly decrease the empirical standard deviations of UT1-UTC, but length-of-day (LOD) comparisons show a possibility to improve the results with direct ray-tracing. In Teke et al (2015), the use of GNSS-derived gradients showed only small improvement in UT1-UTC accuracy. Additionally, in Nilsson et al (2011), daily 2-h segments from the 15-day CONT08 campaign in August 2008 were used to emulate single-baseline experiments corresponding to INT1 and INT2 sessions.…”
Section: Analysis Of Intensive Vlbi Sessionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Boehm et al (2010) showed that the use of a priori values from direct raytracing or linear horizontal gradients on the TsukubaWettzell baseline (INT2) did not significantly decrease the empirical standard deviations of UT1-UTC, but length-of-day (LOD) comparisons show a possibility to improve the results with direct ray-tracing. In Teke et al (2015), the use of GNSS-derived gradients showed only small improvement in UT1-UTC accuracy. Additionally, in Nilsson et al (2011), daily 2-h segments from the 15-day CONT08 campaign in August 2008 were used to emulate single-baseline experiments corresponding to INT1 and INT2 sessions.…”
Section: Analysis Of Intensive Vlbi Sessionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is possible to compute a priori values for the gradients with external data from, e.g., numerical weather models or by estimating the gradients using observations from co-located GNSS sites. The effect of this additional information to the UT1-UTC estimation has been investigated in, e.g., Boehm et al (2010) and Teke et al (2015). Boehm et al (2010) showed that the use of a priori values from direct raytracing or linear horizontal gradients on the TsukubaWettzell baseline (INT2) did not significantly decrease the empirical standard deviations of UT1-UTC, but length-of-day (LOD) comparisons show a possibility to improve the results with direct ray-tracing.…”
Section: Analysis Of Intensive Vlbi Sessionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A single-technique solution where tropospheric gradients are provided as a priori information and ZWD is estimated online, has been described as the most precise formulation for the processing of intensive sessions (Teke et al 2015). We validate this assumption and evaluate the performance of COL against it.…”
Section: Comparison To Single-technique Analyses With a Priori Gradientsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The tropospheric gradients, and in particular the one that lies on the east-west direction, have been shown to have a significant impact in the quality of (UT1-UTC) (Böhm and Schuh 2007) and can amount to some tens of μs (Böhm et al 2010). In fact, previous research points towards including a priori determined gradients, and estimating ZWD, as the preferred analysis scheme for VLBI intensive sessions (Teke et al 2015), and the effect of ray-traced gradients on (UT1-UTC) has also been explored (Landskron and Böhm 2019).…”
Section: Tropospheric Gradientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results worsen if GNSS-based ZTDs are used as a priori value and not estimated. Nevertheless, the evolution of the software presented could be used in the frame of VLBI intensive sessions analysis, since GNSS-based gradients improve UT1 estimation [11].…”
Section: Troposhere Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%