The purpose of this study was to provide a systematic review of studies concerning social support in youth sport from 1990 until 2013. A total of 73 studies were evaluated and are reported in four sections: sample characteristics; research designs; social support provider type; and key correlates relating to social support.Samples ranged from one to564. Studies examined a wide range of sports, ages (10 -22 years) and competition levels. Studies used qualitative (23%), quantitative (75%), and mixed-model (2%) designs. The main conclusion is that recent advances in the conceptualization of social support have generated a more diverse set of methods to examine the quantity and satisfaction of social support in a sports context. Coaches were identified as the most prevalent provider of social support through offering participants unique forms of tangible, informational, emotional and esteem support. Furthermore, coach, parent and peer support plays a significant role in shaping youth sport experiences both from a positive (athlete motivation levels, elite sport participation) and negative perspective (drop out). The discussion focuses on the current status of the research area, limitations, suggested practical implications (e.g., providing proactive support) and future research directions (e.g., examining optimal support matching).
Keywords: parents, coaches, peers, networks, interpersonal support A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF SOCIAL SUPPORT IN YOUTH SPORT
3
A systematic review of social support in youth sportResearch suggests social support involves "an exchange of resources between at least two individuals perceived by the provider or recipient to be intended to enhance the well being of the recipient" (Shumaker & Brownell, 1984, p.13). Support derived from key interpersonal relationships (e.g., coaches, parents, peers) in a sporting context has been identified as an important resource for athletes. The quality and type of social support an athlete perceives and receives is linked with recovery from injury, youth sport participation, burnout, self-confidence, and performance (Bianco & Eklund, 2001;Holt & Hoar, 2006;.Although there is an increased awareness and promotion of social support in sport (Jowett & Lavallee, 2007), research to date has not completed a systematic review of social support in a youth sport context. The case for conducting such a review of the evidence-base is strengthened due recent developments in the research field. The construct of social support has been diversified in order to consider the structural (number and type of relationships) and functional (perceived and received support) aspects of interpersonal relationships (Lakey, 2010). This multi-dimensional conceptualization of social support has recently generated a more diverse set of methods to examine the quantity and satisfaction of social support in a sports context (Freeman, Coffee & Rees, 2011).A review of the extant literature points to a rapidly evolving research area. In the 1990s, research into the theme of interpersonal...