2005
DOI: 10.1086/497548
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Goals as Excuses or Guides: The Liberating Effect of Perceived Goal Progress on Choice

Abstract: Consumer choices are often driven by multiple goals (e.g., career and family), each of which if viewed in isolation may appear to suggest conflicting choices. This article examines the effect of initial goal pursuit on consumers' interest in pursuing unrelated or even conflicting goals. Four studies were conducted to test whether perceived goal progress hinders the pursuit of the focal goal. These studies demonstrate that in the course of self-regulation progress along one goal liberates people to pursue incon… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

19
591
4
6

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 578 publications
(620 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
19
591
4
6
Order By: Relevance
“…We then manipulated perceived closeness by imposing a low versus high closeness standard (Fishbach and Dhar 2005) and retrieval ease (Schwarz et al 1991). Specifically, participants read that friends usually share resources (e.g., books, seats).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We then manipulated perceived closeness by imposing a low versus high closeness standard (Fishbach and Dhar 2005) and retrieval ease (Schwarz et al 1991). Specifically, participants read that friends usually share resources (e.g., books, seats).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding goal progress, individuals consider their previous goalrelated behaviour as evidence of having made progress to the goal, which could produce a sense of achievement and goal fulfilment. Consequently, they shift their cognitive resources away from this initial goal and focus on achieving other goals (Dhar & Simonson, 1999;Monin & Miller, 2001;Fishbach & Dhar, 2005). However, in terms of goal commitment, previous goal-related behaviour can be regarded as evidence of commitment to the goal, which could still maintain cognitive resources focused on the goal, strengthening one's firm determination to achieve the goal.…”
Section: Address For Correspondence: Dr Liuna Geng Department Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to different goal foci, motivations can differ and lead to distinct behaviours. For instance, when individuals are focused on goal progress, they may feel a sense of achievement associated with goal fulfilment, and their cognitive resources would then switch to other unattained goals, motivating them away from the initial goal (Dhar & Simonson, 1999;Monin & Miller, 2001;Fishbach, & Dhar, 2005). This can manifest as a licensing effect.…”
Section: Relationship Between the Licensing Effect And Goal Regulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…People often simultaneously hold multiple goals they hope to accomplish (Cantor & Langston, 1989;Emmons & King, 1988;Fishbach & Dhar, 2005), and they may wish to maximize goal attainment by choosing means that serve more than a single goal. For example, a person who holds commuting and exercising goals may choose to commute by bike.…”
Section: Preference For Means and Means Choicementioning
confidence: 99%