The hydrated electronthe
species that results from the
addition of a single excess electron to liquid waterhas been
the focus of much interest both because of its role in radiation chemistry
and other chemical reactions, and because it provides for a deceptively
simple system that can serve as a means to confront the predictions
of quantum molecular dynamics simulations with experiment. Despite
all this interest, there is still considerable debate over the molecular
structure of the hydrated electron: does it occupy a cavity, have
a significant number of interior water molecules, or have a structure
somewhere in between? The reason for all this debate is that different
computer simulations have produced each of these different structures,
yet the predicted properties for these different structures are still
in reasonable agreement with experiment. In this Feature Article,
we explore the reasons underlying why different structures are produced
when different pseudopotentials are used in quantum simulations of
the hydrated electron. We also show that essentially all the different
models for the hydrated electron, including those from fully ab initio calculations, have relatively little direct overlap
of the electron’s wave function with the nearby water molecules.
Thus, a non-cavity hydrated electron is better thought of as an “inverse
plum pudding” model, with interior waters that locally expel
the surrounding electron’s charge density. Finally, we also
explore the agreement between different hydrated electron models and
certain key experiments, such as resonance Raman spectroscopy and
the temperature dependence and degree of homogeneous broadening of
the optical absorption spectrum, in order to distinguish between the
different simulated structures. Taken together, we conclude that the
hydrated electron likely has a significant number of interior water
molecules.