1996
DOI: 10.1016/0190-7409(96)00011-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Going home and returning to foster care

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
38
0
11

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
38
0
11
Order By: Relevance
“…Although their review of case records showed that maternal criminal history was a key predictor of reentry, they found no clear relationship to several other expected predictors such as type of maltreatment, parental visiting, gender, or time in out-of-home care. Festinger's (1996) study of 210 children in New York and who were younger than 15 years at the time of entry into CWS is something of an exception. This study detailed measures of factors contributing to reentry, but obtained on a sample of children with a broad age range (with a median and mean age of about 6 years old).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although their review of case records showed that maternal criminal history was a key predictor of reentry, they found no clear relationship to several other expected predictors such as type of maltreatment, parental visiting, gender, or time in out-of-home care. Festinger's (1996) study of 210 children in New York and who were younger than 15 years at the time of entry into CWS is something of an exception. This study detailed measures of factors contributing to reentry, but obtained on a sample of children with a broad age range (with a median and mean age of about 6 years old).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rates of re-entry to care are difficult to compare, as samples vary in terms of age, reasons for admission to care, time in care and length of follow-up. Studies from the USA have reported rates of re-entry ranging from 13-28%, (Barth, Weigensberg, Fisher, Fetrow, & Green, 2008;Courtney, 1995;Festinger, 1996;Goodman, 1997;Shaw, 2006;Wells & Guo, 1999;Wulczyn, 1991Wulczyn, , 2004. In Scandinavia, a Danish study found a re-entry rate of 22% within two years of reunification and cited a rate of 25% in Sweden over the same period (Ubbesen, Petersen, Mortensen, & Kristensen, 2012;Vinnerlung, Oman, & Gunnarson, 2004).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No que diz respeito à possibilidade de sucesso na reinserção familiar, habilidades parentais pobres e a ausência ou pobre apoio social são fatores de risco que contribuem para a não manutenção da criança no ambiente familiar 33 . Por outro lado, contatos freqüentes entre a família e criança durante o período de afastamento, assim como a presença de pelo menos um dos pais biológicos, são fatores que favorecem uma reinserção bem sucedida 29 .…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…As visitas freqüentes dos pais às crianças retiradas de casa foram consideradas um poderoso fator para a efetivação da reunificação familiar, sendo que aqueles que receberam visitas, conforme reco-mendado pela Assistência Social, tiveram mais chances de voltar para casa 32 . Já o estudo de Festinger apontou os fatores de risco familiares mais relevantes para o reabrigamento (reincidên-cia da institucionalização), como habilidades parentais pobres, ausência ou pobre apoio social e recusa de serviços externos necessários, como um programa de treinamento de habilidades parentais 33 .…”
Section: Reinserção Familiarunclassified