2013
DOI: 10.1002/kpm.1425
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Going Practical on the Core Competence Concept: On Links, Levels, Time and Context

Abstract: We update the original core competence notions of identification and development to fit high efficient innovation processes in dynamic environments, with aim to progress the concept's applicability for scholars and practitioners. To the core competence concept we add four dimensions previously missing: time (shared history and shared future aims), managerial hierarchy levels (corporate and SBU), innovation development modes and outcome types (radical/ incremental and exploitation/exploration), and finally inno… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While the exploration of new knowledge and the exploitation of current knowledge are both of strategic importance (Ljungquist, 2013), their simultaneous management requires organisational ambidexterity (De Visser and Faems, 2015;O'Reilly and Tushman, 2011). This is, in itself, a dynamic organisational capability (Liu, 2006;Mudambi and Swift, 2014) from which competitive advantage can be derived (O'Reilly and Tushman, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the exploration of new knowledge and the exploitation of current knowledge are both of strategic importance (Ljungquist, 2013), their simultaneous management requires organisational ambidexterity (De Visser and Faems, 2015;O'Reilly and Tushman, 2011). This is, in itself, a dynamic organisational capability (Liu, 2006;Mudambi and Swift, 2014) from which competitive advantage can be derived (O'Reilly and Tushman, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One framework for understanding this involves classifying innovations themselves as either incremental or radical. Incremental innovations represent relatively less change from the status quo, enhancing “current business” with a “shorter time lag for performance effects than radical innovation.” Radical innovations represent relatively more or even fundamental change from the status quo, developing new business within a longer time frame for performance than incremental innovation (Ljungquist, 2013, p. 226).…”
Section: Chaptermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another framework for understanding this second contribution of core competencies involves classifying modes of innovation as either exploitation or exploration. Exploitation involves “rapid core competence development, though it comes with low expected market impact” (Ljungquist, 2013, p. 227). Exploration involves longer term core competence development, with “a higher expected market impact.”…”
Section: Chaptermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At home, Zeng jinming [1] puts forward feasible Suggestions for the improvement of core competitiveness of third-party logistics enterprises in China by using fuzzy comprehensive evaluation methods for the core competitiveness of third-party logistics enterprises. Du Yi [2] in studies of the third party logistics enterprise core competitive ability is proposed in, using the SWOT analysis of the factors influencing the core competence of weights, for Suzhou third party logistics enterprise core competitive power evaluation and ascension offers certain theoretical reference value. Zhang Haiyan [3] puts forward how to improve the core competitiveness of pharmaceutical logistics enterprises.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%