2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfbs.2017.01.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Going private: A socioemotional wealth perspective on why family controlled companies decide to leave the stock-exchange

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0
10

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
30
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…The identity (I), binding ties (B), and emotional attachment (E) dimensions are often used to describe both internal and external motivations related to noneconomic goals. Our review illustrates that these three dimensions of SEW can exist independently of one another (e.g., Debicki et al, 2016) but also complement each other to explain SEW and the strategic decision making of family firms (e.g., Berrone et al, 2010; Boers et al, 2017). For instance, Berrone et al (2012) suggest that the emotional attachment and identification of family members are likely to vary with changes in ownership.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The identity (I), binding ties (B), and emotional attachment (E) dimensions are often used to describe both internal and external motivations related to noneconomic goals. Our review illustrates that these three dimensions of SEW can exist independently of one another (e.g., Debicki et al, 2016) but also complement each other to explain SEW and the strategic decision making of family firms (e.g., Berrone et al, 2010; Boers et al, 2017). For instance, Berrone et al (2012) suggest that the emotional attachment and identification of family members are likely to vary with changes in ownership.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…This indicates that the green dumpers are addressing environmental variables not only in response to their environmental awareness (Kuckertz & Wagner, 2010) but also from the perspective of expansion and profit. This indicates the presence of a “mixed gamble” (Boers, Ljungkvist, Brunninge, & Nordqvist, 2017) regarding environmental and economic awareness. The small manufacturing businesses with the highest growth and profitability act according to a “good enough” attitude, that is, their low values for waste management are compensated for by relatively high values in the three other measured environmental areas, indicating that waste management incurs relatively high costs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the factor balance within each cluster appears to be sensitive. Regardless of EO, a low level of one of the environmental variables can result in better financial results, implying a mixed gamble (Boers et al, 2017) in which several companies (i.e., a cluster) have identified the value of not developing a particular type of costly environmental practice, resulting in higher growth and profitability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Schulze & Kellermanns, 2015). Os estudos empíricos utilizam, em sua maioria, proxies de controle para inferir a SEW (Boers et al, 2017;Hauck et al, 2016;Miller & Le Breton-Miller, 2014), porém, o conceito é centrado nas emoções envolvidas no processo decisório.…”
Section: Resultados Da Sewunclassified
“…Primeiro, as empresas familiares foram definidas a partir de sua essência e não dos componentes do envolvimento familiar, que são uma condição necessária, mas não suficiente para distinguir uma empresa familiar de uma não familiar Dawson & Mussolino, 2014). Segundo, os dados para medir SEW foram coletados diretamente com as empresas familiares; com isso, é atendido o chamado de diversos autores em favor da utilização de dados primários para testar o efeito da SEW como um conceitochave na diferenciação das empresas familiares (Boers, Ljungkvist, Brunninge, & Nordqvist, 2017;Debicki et al, 2016;Hauck, Suess-Reyes, Beck, Prügl, & Frank, 2016;Miller & Le Breton-Miller, 2014;Schulze & Kellermanns, 2015). Terceiro, ao fazer uma diferenciação entre as empresas familiares e as possíveis combinações que as levam à efetividade no processo decisório de seus conselhos, contribui-se para a discussão da heterogeneidade em empresas familiares Chua et al, 2012), evitando a visão dicotômica entre empresas familiares e não familiares.…”
Section: Contribuiçõesunclassified