2010
DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21198
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Going Their Separate Ways: Dissociation of Hippocampal and Dorsolateral Prefrontal Activation during Episodic Retrieval and Post-retrieval Processing

Abstract: Hippocampal activity is modulated during episodic memory retrieval. Most consistently, a relative increase in activity during confident retrieval is observed. Dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) is also activated during retrieval, but may be more generally activated during cognitive-control processes. The "default network," regions activated during rest or internally focused tasks, includes the hippocampus, but not DLPFC. Therefore, DLPFC and the hippocampus should diverge during difficult tasks suppressing… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

9
23
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
9
23
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Event-related fMRI was used to investigate BOLD responses during cued recall and post-retrieval processing of previously studied word pairs relative to a non-memory classification task. Consistent with prior evidence of hippocampal deactivation during elaborative associative recall of paired visual objects (Israel et al, 2010), results confirmed that hippocampal deactivation occurs during elaborative associative recall of paired words, allowing further isolation and examination of the factors that modulate this suppression. To investigate the neural correlates underlying retrieval-related components of memory search, successful retrieval, and post-retrieval processing, we examined task conditions that had different levels of each.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Event-related fMRI was used to investigate BOLD responses during cued recall and post-retrieval processing of previously studied word pairs relative to a non-memory classification task. Consistent with prior evidence of hippocampal deactivation during elaborative associative recall of paired visual objects (Israel et al, 2010), results confirmed that hippocampal deactivation occurs during elaborative associative recall of paired words, allowing further isolation and examination of the factors that modulate this suppression. To investigate the neural correlates underlying retrieval-related components of memory search, successful retrieval, and post-retrieval processing, we examined task conditions that had different levels of each.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Task-related deactivation, such as that seen in default network regions, might also explain relative signal differences in the hippocampus. A prior study demonstrated robust hippocampal deactivation during cued recall and post-retrieval processing of visual paired associates (Israel et al, 2010), described as “elaborative associative recall.” Externally directed thought and task difficulty are known to deactivate the default network (Greicius et al, 2003b; McKiernan et al, 2003; Vincent et al, 2008), and maintenance of an item in working memory can suppress hippocampal activity (Axmacher et al, 2007). It is therefore possible that either directed search effort prior to retrieval or post-retrieval working memory processing is a primary mediator of hippocampal activity during memory retrieval, rather than the retrieval event, itself.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, although the hippocampal response during successful recall was below threshold, the hippocampal response during failed recall was robustly deactivated, consistent with Reas et al (2011). Despite evidence for default network activations during memory retrieval, which are generally attributed to autobiographical or self-referential task conditions (Spreng & Grady, 2010; Maguire, 2001; Andreasen et al, 1995), these results provide further evidence for task-negative responses in these regions during effortful episodic memory retrieval (Gimbel & Brewer, 2011; Israel, Seibert, Black, & Brewer, 2010), which may be driven by mental search processes (Reas et al, 2011). Furthermore, they expand on prior studies, which did not simultaneously assess effects of search and associative memory strength, to reveal that default network deactivations are more likely attributable to search than retrieval strength differences.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…Furthermore, it is noteworthy that several of the studies demonstrating hippocampal deactivations in arguably hippocampusrelevant conditions reported worse behavioral performance in that particular condition (Lambrey et al, 2012;Rodriguez, 2010;Shipman & Astur, 2008;Rekkas et al, 2005). However, the coupling of the hippocampus with other default regions during memory retrieval appears to vary according to task condition Huijbers, Pennartz, Cabeza, & Daselaar, 2011;Reas et al, 2011), which indicates that the areas deactivated during memory retrieval may only partially overlap with those deactivated during nonmemory tasks (Israel, Seibert, Black, & Brewer, 2010). In relation to this, although the more difficult EC condition was associated with deactivations in default regions such as the medial pFC, the posterior cingulate cortex, and the inferior parietal lobule, it was associated with strong activations in another default region, the retrosplenial cortex (Buckner, Andrews-Hanna, & Schacter, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%