Going to the Source: Creating a Citizenship Outcome Measure by Community-Based Participatory Research Methods

Rowe, Michael; Clayton, Ashley; Benedict, Patricia; Bellamy, Chyrell; Antunes, Kimberly; Miller, Rebecca; Pelletier, Jean‐François; Stern, Erica B.; O’Connell, Maria

doi:10.1176/appi.ps.201100272

Cited by 67 publications

(70 citation statements)

References 15 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Multidimensional scaling and hierarchical cluster analysis revealed seven primary domains of citizenship: personal responsibilities ; government and infrastructure ; caring for self and others ; civil rights ; legal rights ; choices ; and world stewardship [14]. …”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Several tools have been developed to assess recovery [12], but until very recently no measure was available to assess citizenship from the perspective of persons in recovery. In a review of the literature [13] based on a MEDLINE search with the key words “citizenship”, “measure”, and “mental health”, the CM is the only referenced tool specifically designed to assess the degrees to which individuals with psychiatric disorders perceive themselves to have full citizenship [14]. On the other hand, the search with “recovery”, “measure”, and “mental health” yielded 392 references.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Citizenship and recovery: two intertwined concepts for civic-recovery

et al. 2015

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundValidation of the psychometric properties of a new measure of citizenship was required for a research project in the province of Quebec, Canada. This study was meant to study the interplay between recovery- and citizenship-oriented supportive employment. As recovery and citizenship were expected to be two related concepts, convergent validity between the Citizenship Measure (CM) and the Recovery Assessment Scale (RAS) was tested.MethodsStudy objectives were to: 1) conduct exploratory factor analyses on the CM and confirmatory factor analysis on the RAS tools (construct validity), 2) calculate Cronbach’s alphas for each dimension emerging from objective 1 (reliability), and 3) calculate correlations between all dimensions from both tools (convergent validity). Data were collected from 174 individuals with serious mental illness, working in social firms. Serious mental illnesses include major depression, schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, obsessive compulsive disorder, panic disorder, post traumatic stress disorder and borderline personality disorder.ResultsFive factors emerged from the exploratory factor analysis of the CM, with good reliability. Confirmatory factor analyses showed that the short and the long versions of the RAS present satisfactory results. Finally, the correlation matrix indicated that all dimensions from both tools are significantly correlated, thus confirming their convergent validity.ConclusionsThis study confirms the validity and reliability of two tools, CM and RAS. These tools can be used in combination to assess citizenship and recovery, both of which may be combined in the new concept of civic-recovery.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Citizenship and recovery: two intertwined concepts for civic-recovery

et al. 2015

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In deciding who should test the tool in its early stage of development, we chose case managers for various reasons. The rehabilitation and the growth and development tasks of case management are particularly germane to the five R's contained within the providers' citizenship tool, including: relationships that convey, affirm, and validate a sense of belonging; rights; responsibilities; roles; and resources (Rowe, 2015;Rowe, et al, 2012). Because case managers work elbow-to-elbow and shoulder-to-shoulder directly with clients in their homes and on their streets (Rakfeldt, Sledge, Bailey, & Anderson, 1996), they are best positioned to link and to broker connections for clients to citizenship programs and naturally occurring citizenship affirming activities within their communities.…”

Section: Translating Research Into Practice: Developing a Citizens Toolmentioning

confidence: 99%

Development of the citizens measure into a tool to guide clinical practice and its utility for case managers

Bellamy

Kriegel

Barrenger

et al. 2017

American Journal of Psychiatric Rehabilitation

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Declaration of Interest:The views in this publication are solely the responsibility of the authors. The Commission is not responsible for any use that may be made of the information it contains. FUNDINGThis project has received funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement No 690954.Correspondence related to this manuscript can be sent to Chyrell D. Bellamy, chyrell.bellamy@yale.edu Rowe: relationships, rights, resources, roles, and rights, and a sense of belonging. While a measure has its utility in clinical settings, in order to address time constraints and other administrative burdens expressed by providers in their day-to-day practice, a Citizens tool was developed as a practical way that providers can enhance dialogue between providers and clients on citizenship for clients served in mental health and criminal justice reentry settings. This paper describes the development of the tool, testing of the tool's utility with case managers, and implications for practice.

show abstract

“…Rowe 8 has described how CBPR and concept mapping were used to develop a multi-dimensional construct of citizenship in relation to people with mental illness. In another study CBPR methods were used to develop coping skills interventions designed to increase the utilization of services by African American adolescents and transition age youth.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Developing a Community-Based Participatory Research Model to Engage Transition Age Youth Using Mental Health Service in Research

Lincoln

Borg

Delman

2015

Family &Amp; Community Health

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We present a model for the development and conduct of a Community-Based Participatory Research (CBPR) project with transition age youth (TAY) mental health service users. CBPR frameworks can facilitate equitable partnerships and meaningful inclusion, but have not been fully drawn-upon in mental health research. The model included TAY as trained research associates involved in every aspect of the research process. We describe the development of the project, creation of the research team, training, the design and conduct of the study, and challenges faced. The methods developed successfully provided support for the meaningful participation of TAY in the project.

show abstract

Going to the Source: Creating a Citizenship Outcome Measure by Community-Based Participatory Research Methods

Abstract: Citizenship is a multidimensional construct encompassing the degree to which individuals with different life experiences perceive inclusion or involvement across a variety of activities and concepts.

Cited by 67 publications

References 15 publications

Citizenship and recovery: two intertwined concepts for civic-recovery

Citizenship and recovery: two intertwined concepts for civic-recovery

Development of the citizens measure into a tool to guide clinical practice and its utility for case managers

Developing a Community-Based Participatory Research Model to Engage Transition Age Youth Using Mental Health Service in Research

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About