1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0010-8545(97)00028-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gold 1994

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Au(1)−S(1) bond is slightly longer than the Au(2)−S(2) bond, which can be attributed to a higher extent of strain in the square environment of Au(1) compared with the linear coordination of Au(2). The Au−Au distance of 2.978(2) Å is comparable with values found in other bi- or multinuclear gold compounds , and is consistent with a bonding “aurophilic” interaction. This is remarkable because Au(1) doubtlessly represents a gold(III) site and both gold atoms are elongated from their ideal coordination environments toward each other.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The Au(1)−S(1) bond is slightly longer than the Au(2)−S(2) bond, which can be attributed to a higher extent of strain in the square environment of Au(1) compared with the linear coordination of Au(2). The Au−Au distance of 2.978(2) Å is comparable with values found in other bi- or multinuclear gold compounds , and is consistent with a bonding “aurophilic” interaction. This is remarkable because Au(1) doubtlessly represents a gold(III) site and both gold atoms are elongated from their ideal coordination environments toward each other.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…However, in other experiments native gold was not oxidized and the formation of gold colloids and sols from gold(I/III) complexes was promoted (Fetzer, 1934(Fetzer, , 1946Ong and Swanson, 1969;Fisher et al, 1974;Gray et al, 1998). The interaction of gold and organic matter involves mostly electron donor elements, such as N, O or S, rather than C (Housecroft, 1993(Housecroft, , 1997a. Vlassopoulos et al (1990b) showed that gold binds preferentially to organic S under reducing conditions, whereas under oxidizing conditions it binds mostly to organic N and C. Organo-gold complexes can be present in aqueous solution as gold(I) cyanide complexes (Housecroft, 1993(Housecroft, , 1997a.…”
Section: The Geochemical Characteristics Of Goldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interaction of gold and organic matter involves mostly electron donor elements, such as N, O or S, rather than C (Housecroft, 1993(Housecroft, , 1997a. Vlassopoulos et al (1990b) showed that gold binds preferentially to organic S under reducing conditions, whereas under oxidizing conditions it binds mostly to organic N and C. Organo-gold complexes can be present in aqueous solution as gold(I) cyanide complexes (Housecroft, 1993(Housecroft, , 1997a. Gold(I) forms a strong complex with cyanide [Au(CN) 2 À ] that is stable over a wide range of Eh-pH conditions (Boyle, 1979;Gray, 1998).…”
Section: The Geochemical Characteristics Of Goldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, gold has been shown to display rich cluster and coordination chemistry 1–10, and gold nanoparticles 11, 12 and nanoelectrodes 13 (containing hundreds of gold atoms) are becoming very important in molecular electronics applications in which molecules are chemically bound to them. Computational approaches to the structural and electronic properties of these systems are typically based either on Hückel (tight binding) theory or on density‐functional calculations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%