Gold Dental Implant-Induced Oral Lichen Planus

Rasul, Taha F; Anderson, Jackson D; Bergholz, Daniel R; Faiz, Arfa; Prasad, Rishi R

doi:10.7759/cureus.21852

Cited by 4 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 13 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Ceramics should be preferred over resins for definitive treatments due to a decreased accumulation of biofilm to feldspathic ceramics. Metals such as gold, mercury, palladium, nickel, and copper could be associated with OLP, especially with oral lichenoid lesions, and thus should be avoided [ 41 ].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Dental Implant Treatment in Patients Suffering from Oral Lichen Planus: A Narrative Review

Górski

2022

IJERPH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: The aim of this study was to describe the complications and survival rates of dental implants placed in patients suffering from oral lichen planus (OLP) and to present recommendations for implant treatment in this group of patients through a narrative review of the published studies. Methods: A search of the literature was conducted using four databases: PubMed/Medline, Web of Science, Cochrane, and Scopus with a stop date of May 2022. Results: Eighteen studies were evaluated. The results showed that dental implant survival rates in patients with OLP were similar to those reported in the general population. Moreover, the existing literature seemed to imply that OLP is not a suspected risk factor for peri-implant diseases. However, patients suffering from erosive forms of OLP or desquamative gingivitis and poor oral hygiene were more susceptible to developing peri-implant diseases; in addition, oral squamous cell carcinoma was observed in a few cases of OLP. Conclusion: With the limitations of this narrative review, dental implants may be regarded as a safe and feasible therapeutic approach to the treatment of patients with well-controlled OLP. These patients should be monitored carefully during follow-up care. Well-designed prospective trials are required to validate the present findings.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Dental Implant Treatment in Patients Suffering from Oral Lichen Planus: A Narrative Review

Górski

2022

IJERPH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The performed broad PT panel was mono-positive for Au. The oral lichen planus resulted from the Au dental implants [ 116 ].…”

Section: Implantsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Metal Allergy: State-of-the-Art Mechanisms, Biomarkers, Hypersensitivity to Implants

Zemelka‐Wiącek¹

2022

JCM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Metal allergy is mainly an environmental disorder which can cause allergic contact dermatitis. Environmental metal exposures include jewelry, everyday metal items, mobile phones, leather, metal-rich food and implants, including stents or anchors. While consumer exposure is liable for the majority of metal hypersensitivity cases, the significance of occupational exposure to metals remains relevant. Although the most common metal allergens are nickel, chromium, and cobalt; however, lately, gold, palladium, titanium, and some others have also attracted attention. This review highlights advances in metal allergy mechanisms, biomarkers for potential patients’ stratification as well as biological treatments. The most recent evidence of human exposure to metal for risk assessment is discussed, as well as the relationship between the occurrence of metal hypersensitivity and implanted devices, including non-characteristic symptoms. The latest data on the diagnosis of metal hypersensitivity are also reported.

show abstract

Stabilized oral lichen planus does not compromise dental implants survival: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Li,

Kot,

McGrath

et al. 2024

Oral Diseases

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundThis study aimed to evaluate the incidence of implant failure in patients with oral lichen planus (OLP) and investigate the potential association between OLP and peri‐implant diseases.Materials and MethodsEmbase, Web of Science, PubMed, and Scopus databases were searched for studies with no time restrictions. Meta‐analysis was performed calculating pooled proportion of peri‐implantitis (PI), peri‐implant mucositis (PIM), and bleeding on probing (BOP) prevalence using fixed‐effects model. Odds ratio and corresponding 95% CI were calculated to assess the potential risk of PI, PIM, and BOP in dental implant patients with OLP compared to healthy controls.ResultsImplant failure rate was 4.38% at the patient level and 4.37% at the implant level. Six patients (3.92%) from five studies were diagnosed with oral cancer after receiving implant. The prevalence of PI, PIM, and BOP at the implant level were 14.00%, 20.00%, and 40.00%, respectively. There was no significant difference in the occurrence of PI and PIM between OLP patients and healthy controls.ConclusionsStabilized OLP is not considered a significant risk factor for peri‐implant diseases. It is advised against placing implants or prostheses during the acute phase of the disease. Histopathological investigation to differentiate OLP from oral lichenoid dysplasia is crucial.

show abstract

Gold Dental Implant-Induced Oral Lichen Planus

Cited by 4 publications

References 13 publications

Dental Implant Treatment in Patients Suffering from Oral Lichen Planus: A Narrative Review

Dental Implant Treatment in Patients Suffering from Oral Lichen Planus: A Narrative Review

Metal Allergy: State-of-the-Art Mechanisms, Biomarkers, Hypersensitivity to Implants

Stabilized oral lichen planus does not compromise dental implants survival: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About