Iconologia Sacra 1994
DOI: 10.1515/9783110846119.144
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Goldbrakteaten und Dänenkönige

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Workload and testbed. We use FIO [2] for microbenchmark evaluations. FIO generates reads and writes with full sequential and full random patterns; in the evaluation, four different microbenchmark patterns, we denote them as SEQ_RD (sequential reads), RND_RD (random reads), SEQ_WR (sequential writes), and RND_WR (random writes), respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Workload and testbed. We use FIO [2] for microbenchmark evaluations. FIO generates reads and writes with full sequential and full random patterns; in the evaluation, four different microbenchmark patterns, we denote them as SEQ_RD (sequential reads), RND_RD (random reads), SEQ_WR (sequential writes), and RND_WR (random writes), respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We employ the widely used [4,6,23,25,39,42] Flexible I/O tester (fio-2.99) [18] to characterize the performance and latency of the systems presented in Table 3. We configure fio to use the libaio Linux library to generate asynchronous I/O traffic for both read and write requests to the NVMe drive.…”
Section: Evaluation 41 Experimental Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering that the smallest block size that the FastPath architecture supports is 4 KB, the maximum request size that can be served simultaneously by the FastPath_Control_MP module is 16 KB. Figure 8 presents the distribution of the latency amongst various layers when running the standard Flexible I/O (fio) benchmark [18] for a single I/O request with 4 KB block size. In particular, Figure 8(a) shows the breakdown of the latency across the Linux OS layers on the Xilinx Zynq-7000 SoC, as presented in our previous work [37].…”
Section: Fastpath_control_mp Modulementioning
confidence: 99%
“…To provide a fair comparison, for each SSE scheme given in the comparison, we analyzed its memory access pattern to deduce its IO workload. We then replayed that workload using the highly optimized fio Flexible I/O Tester (version 3.19) [Axb20]. While doing so, we have systematically advantaged the competition.…”
Section: Performancementioning
confidence: 99%