2023
DOI: 10.3390/biom13071155
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Goldilocks Dilemma: LPS Works Both as the Initial Target and a Barrier for the Antimicrobial Action of Cationic AMPs on E. coli

Abstract: Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) are generally membrane-active compounds that physically disrupt bacterial membranes. Despite extensive research, the precise mode of action of AMPs is still a topic of great debate. This work demonstrates that the initial interaction between the Gram-negative E. coli and AMPs is driven by lipopolysaccharides (LPS) that act as kinetic barriers for the binding of AMPs to the bacterial membrane. A combination of SPR and NMR experiments provide evidence suggesting that cationic AMPs f… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The set was selected as a useful chemical model to study the effects of charge distribution on the interactions. The peptide c-LWwNKr ( Figure 5 ) was included in the study as a control that is chemically similar, but without antimicrobial activity (MIC > 256 μg/mL) ( Junkes et al, 2008 ; Bagheri, 2010 ; Gopal et al, 2012 ; Finger et al, 2015 ; Rainsford et al, 2022 ; Jakubec et al, 2023 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The set was selected as a useful chemical model to study the effects of charge distribution on the interactions. The peptide c-LWwNKr ( Figure 5 ) was included in the study as a control that is chemically similar, but without antimicrobial activity (MIC > 256 μg/mL) ( Junkes et al, 2008 ; Bagheri, 2010 ; Gopal et al, 2012 ; Finger et al, 2015 ; Rainsford et al, 2022 ; Jakubec et al, 2023 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) are receiving increasing attention in the fight against AMR, as their different mode of actions lead to destabilization of bacterial membranes and bacterial death ( Czaplewski et al, 2016 ; Mahlapuu et al, 2016 ; Ageitos et al, 2017 ; Kumar et al, 2018 ). A test panel of five cyclic AMPs with various distributions of charged and hydrophobic amino acids, known to interact with bacterial membranes was used ( Junkes et al, 2008 ; Bagheri, 2010 ; Gopal et al, 2012 ; Finger et al, 2015 ; Rainsford et al, 2022 ; Jakubec et al, 2023 ). This set of peptides was originally designed to study how the peptide charge distribution affects membrane interactions and was used by our lab to explore kinetics of binding towards synthetic liposomes, nanodiscs and to a series of E .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Notably, three-dimensional structures of several AMPs are known to vary significantly when determined in cell membranes or membrane-mimicking environments [ 32 , 41 , 42 ]. In this regard, the atomic-resolution structures of several potent AMPs as a complex with an LPS outer membrane could be correlated with Gram-negative specific activity [ 116 , 117 , 118 , 119 , 120 , 121 , 122 , 123 ]. Cathelicidin-derived AMPs are found to be structurally diverse ( Table 2 ).…”
Section: Importance Of Structures Of Ampsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since AMPs lack an apparent secondary structure, the antibacterial mechanisms of short AMPs remain elusive but is more likely due to interference with membrane protein function than formation of pores. Still, the efficacy and susceptibility profiles of short AMPs are very sensitive to minor alteration of the order and frequency at which amino acids appear ,, to peptide cyclization and to the position and stereochemistry of synthetic side-chains added to the pharmacophore . Given the wealth of possible combinations, exploring which molecular configuration is best for a certain application presents a real challenge.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%