PsycTESTS Dataset 2014
DOI: 10.1037/t42817-000
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Goldsmiths Musical Sophistication Index

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
35
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Simple stimuli are isochronous hymn melodies while the complex stimuli are taken from Schubert lieder. Expertise (2 levels: musician, non-musician) refers to the level of musical training of the participants; musicians scored ≥ 33 on the musical training subscale of the Goldsmiths Musical Sophistication Index (Gold-MSI, v0.9) (Müllensiefen et al, 2011), whereas non-musicians scored ≤ 20 (see Section Participants).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Simple stimuli are isochronous hymn melodies while the complex stimuli are taken from Schubert lieder. Expertise (2 levels: musician, non-musician) refers to the level of musical training of the participants; musicians scored ≥ 33 on the musical training subscale of the Goldsmiths Musical Sophistication Index (Gold-MSI, v0.9) (Müllensiefen et al, 2011), whereas non-musicians scored ≤ 20 (see Section Participants).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Members of the musician group self-declared as such and scored ≥33 on the musical training subscale of the Goldsmiths Musical Sophistication Index (Gold-MSI, v0.9) (Müllensiefen et al, 2011), whereas members of the non-musician group self-declared as such and scored ≤ 20. These upper and lower limits correspond to the 67th and 33rd percentile scores from a random sample of 488 individuals from the general British population (Müllensiefen et al, 2011). Average musical training scores for musicians and non-musicians were 53.12 ( SD : 7.83; range: 36–62) and 13.94 ( SD : 3.56; range: 9–20), respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For measures of musicality, the current study uses the self-report questionnaire from the Goldsmiths Musical Sophistication Index (Gold-MSI) (Müllensiefen et al, 2011), which in its full form includes a battery of listening tests including melodic memory, beat perception, and sound similarity; the self-report questionnaire alone has been validated using objective listening tests and is an effective measure of musical ability (Müllensiefen et al, 2014). The self-report inventory scores participants along five factors of musical engagement: active engagement, perceptual abilities, musical training, singing abilities, and emotional engagement.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, individual differences such as genetic predispositions and possible epigenetic factors related to music (Tan et al, 2014; Kanduri et al, 2015; Schellenberg, 2015), motivation toward music, and exposure to different kinds of musical environments may also influence the differences between behavioral and brain responses to musical stimuli and the interactions between musical experience and language experience. This idea is emphasized by using the Goldsmiths Musical Sophistication Index, a measure of musicality that takes into consideration other factors contributing to interactions with music, weighting them along with formal training to gain a more holistic measure of musical sophistication and greater sensitivity to subtle differences in musical abilities (Müllensiefen et al, 2011, 2014). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%