1991
DOI: 10.2307/40147243
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Goli Otok

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As former inmate Dragoslav Mihailovic remembered, the increasingly porous boundary between the inmates and their keepers (policemen, guards, police investigators) further complicated the situation, making the experience of incarceration even more difficult to handle, since there could develop no real community of the imprisoned, no internal moral code of behavior. 20 Other memoirs argued that self-management was introduced so that all inmates would be tainted, so that all would participate in the crime. Many former inmates understandably saw the invention of self-management as an expression of the ultimate malice of the camp's ideologues: for Putnik, "this was the way to put the inmate in a situation in which he could never raise his head after his release, let alone condemn the system of "re-education."…”
Section: The Search For Genuine Democracy: Self-managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As former inmate Dragoslav Mihailovic remembered, the increasingly porous boundary between the inmates and their keepers (policemen, guards, police investigators) further complicated the situation, making the experience of incarceration even more difficult to handle, since there could develop no real community of the imprisoned, no internal moral code of behavior. 20 Other memoirs argued that self-management was introduced so that all inmates would be tainted, so that all would participate in the crime. Many former inmates understandably saw the invention of self-management as an expression of the ultimate malice of the camp's ideologues: for Putnik, "this was the way to put the inmate in a situation in which he could never raise his head after his release, let alone condemn the system of "re-education."…”
Section: The Search For Genuine Democracy: Self-managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The declaration moment was particularly stressful and dangerous: the inmate who was presenting his attitude found himself in the center of the room, and was prodded by the room warden as well as the activists to admit "what you did, what you used to think, what you are thinking now." 29 Another inmate, Mihovil Horvat, described particularly aggressive declaration sessions when the inmate giving the statement would say something "wrong," unacceptable: "The warden imperceptibly communicated to the collective what he wanted. With roaring and bellowing, hungry beasts jumped out of their cages, ready to dismember the victim.…”
Section: The Search For Genuine Democracy: Self-managementmentioning
confidence: 99%