2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2019.12.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gone with the wind: effects of wind on honey bee visit rate and foraging behaviour

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
39
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
2
39
2
Order By: Relevance
“…automatically closing the beehive gates or changing inside temperature. Henessy et al proved (Hennessy et al, 2020) that wind has direct and indirect effects on foraging of worker bees (Apis mellifera). The former indicates that foraging rate lowers with increase of wind speed, while latter introduces hesitation of taking off from flowers after nectar gathering.…”
Section: Data Fusion Approach Applications In Precision Beekeepingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…automatically closing the beehive gates or changing inside temperature. Henessy et al proved (Hennessy et al, 2020) that wind has direct and indirect effects on foraging of worker bees (Apis mellifera). The former indicates that foraging rate lowers with increase of wind speed, while latter introduces hesitation of taking off from flowers after nectar gathering.…”
Section: Data Fusion Approach Applications In Precision Beekeepingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traffic‐generated turbulence at the road edge (gusts of wind equivalent to an average wind speed of approximately 16 km/hr; Bani‐Hani et al., 2018) might disturb pollinators and is likely to make foraging more difficult (Hennessy et al., 2020). One study has considered this.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Visual detection of a predator depends on the spectral sensitivity of the prey’s eye (the ability of the eye to respond to specific wavelengths of the light spectrum; Cronin et al, (2014)), spatial acuity (the capacity to discriminate shape and pattern details; Caves et al, (2018)) and temporal resolution (time taken to process visual information; Cronin et al, (2014)). Furthermore, abiotic factors such as wind or obstacles can add to the visual clutter in a habitat (Burnett et al, 2020; Hennessy et al, 2020) and consequently hinder predator detection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%