Good governance and local level policy implementation for disaster-risk-reduction: actual, perceptual and contested perspectives in coastal communities in Bangladesh

Abstract

PurposeDespite Bangladesh's great strides in formulating disaster management policies following the principles of good governance, the degree to which these policies have successfully been implemented at the local level remains largely unknown. The objectives of this study were two-fold: (1) to examine the roles and effectiveness of local-level governance and disaster management institutions, and (2) to identify barriers to the implementation of national policies and Disaster-Risk-Reduction (DRR) guidelines at the local community level.Design/methodology/approachBetween January 2014 and June 2015 we carried out an empirical investigation in two coastal communities in Bangladesh. We employed a qualitative research and Case Study approach, using techniques from the Participatory Rural Appraisal toolbox to collect data from local community members as well as government and NGO officials.FindingsOur study revealed that interactive disaster governance, decentralization of disaster management, and compliance by local-level institutions with good governance principles and national policy guidelines can be extremely effective in reducing disaster-loss and damages. According to coastal community members, the local governments have generally failed to uphold good governance principles, and triangulated data confirm that the region at large suffers from rampant corruption, political favoritism, lack of transparency and accountability and minimal inclusion of local inhabitants in decision-making – all of which have severely impeded the successful implementation of national disaster-management policies.Research limitations/implicationsWhile considerable research on good governance has been pursued, our understanding of good disaster governance and their criteria is still poor. In addition, although numerous national disaster management policy and good governance initiatives have been taken in Bangladesh, like many other developing countries, the nature and extent of their local level implementation are not well known. This study contributes to these research gaps, with identification of further research agenda in these areas.Practical implicationsThe study focuses on good disaster governance and management issues and practices, their strengths and limitations in the context of cyclone and storm surges along coastal Bangladesh. It offers specific good disaster governance criteria for improving multi-level successful implementation. The paper deals with International Sendai Framework that called for enhancement of local level community resilience to disasters. Thus, it contributes to numerous policy and practice areas relating to good disaster governance.Social implicationsGood disaster governance would benefit not only from future disaster losses but also from improved prevention and mitigation of natural hazards impact, benefiting society at large. Improvement in knowledge and practice in disaster-risk-reduction through good governance and effective management would ensure local community development and human wellbeing at the national level.Originality/valueThe failure of local-level government institutions to effectively implement national disaster management and resilience-building policies is largely attributable to a lack of financial and human resources, rampant corruption, a lack of accountability and transparency and the exclusion of local inhabitants from decision-making processes. Our study identified the specific manifestations of these failures in coastal communities in Bangladesh. These results underscore the vital need to address the wide gap between national DRR goals and the on-the-ground realities of policy implementation to successfully enhance the country's resilience to climate change-induced disasters.

Gray Measure and Spatial Distribution Exploration of Local Emergency Resilience on Compound Disasters

“…At the same time, applying technical methods in disaster prevention puts higher requirements for learning ability and adaptability of the management subjects and objects, highlighting the importance of the dynamic adaptability of local emergency resilience. In addition, reducing compound disasters is a type of local governance [ 59 ]; full participation and collaboration of related subjects are necessary to improve governance effectiveness. In this governance process, local government plays the role of leader and coordinator and aims to realize the “1 + 1 > 2” governance efficiency through collaborating subjects and resources.…”

Evaluation of climate induced hazards risk for coastal Bangladesh: a participatory approach-based assessment

“…Likewise, the capacity was assessed by using several criteria i.e., present status of local-level Govt. and NGOs structure for disaster management (Azad et al 2019;Seddiky et al 2020;Uddin et al 2020), present status of disaster preparedness plan (Khan 2008;Huq 2016;Islam et al 2021), sound and observed legislation about DRR and disaster preparedness (Banu 2015;Naser 2015;Shahjahan et al 2016), status of diversity of livelihood options in the community (Kamal 2013;Roy and Basu 2020;Sarker et al 2020), existing Govt. resource levels to minimize disaster risk (Khan and Rahman 2007;Afrin 2018), people knowledge level of different hazards (I.…”

Social learning-based disaster resilience: collective action in flash flood-prone Sunamganj communities in Bangladesh

“…faith-based committees, social networks, school committees) play indispensable roles in maximising collective capital and taking action collaboratively at the local level. Several recent studies have confirmed that they utilise social learning processes as a pathway to enhance community resilience (Choudhury et al, 2021;Uddin et al, 2020a;Uddin et al, 2020b).…”