Good practice in health care for migrants: views and experiences of care professionals in 16 European countries

Abstract

BackgroundHealth services across Europe provide health care for migrant patients every day. However, little systematic research has explored the views and experiences of health care professionals in different European countries. The aim of this study was to assess the difficulties professionals experience in their service when providing such care and what they consider constitutes good practice to overcome these problems or limit their negative impact on the quality of care.MethodsStructured interviews with open questions and case vignettes were conducted with health care professionals working in areas with high proportion of migrant populations in 16 countries. In each country, professionals in nine primary care practices, three accident and emergency hospital departments, and three community mental health services (total sample = 240) were interviewed about their views and experiences in providing care for migrant patients, i.e. from first generation immigrant populations. Answers were analysed using thematic content analysis.ResultsEight types of problems and seven components of good practice were identified representing all statements in the interviews. The eight problems were: language barriers, difficulties in arranging care for migrants without health care coverage, social deprivation and traumatic experiences, lack of familiarity with the health care system, cultural differences, different understandings of illness and treatment, negative attitudes among staff and patients, and lack of access to medical history. The components of good practice to overcome these problems or limit their impact were: organisational flexibility with sufficient time and resources, good interpreting services, working with families and social services, cultural awareness of staff, educational programmes and information material for migrants, positive and stable relationships with staff, and clear guidelines on the care entitlements of different migrant groups. Problems and good care components were similar across the three types of services.ConclusionsHealth care professionals in different services experience similar difficulties when providing care to migrants. They also have relatively consistent views on what constitutes good practice. The degree to which these components already are part of routine practice varies. Implementing good practice requires sufficient resources and organisational flexibility, positive attitudes, training for staff and the provision of information.

Reporting mental health problems of undocumented migrants in Greece: A qualitative exploration

“…[3] Mental health problems in UMs are reported in the international (primary healthcare) literature, but little is known about the problems Greek GPs encounter in UMs. [3,5,[15][16][17] The aim of the study was to gain insight in how Greek GPs cope with UMs with mental health problems, the barriers and levers encountered and solutions applied. We anticipate that the results of this study will be useful for the policy makers when the primary healthcare reform is under development.…”

Compassionate care provision: an immense need during the refugee crisis: lessons learned from a European capacity-building project

“…The literature search and interviews with experts found that in order to provide compassionate care crucial problems and barriers occur at the levels of professional, patient, and organisation. Many studies identified the training of professionals in culturally sensitive aspects of care as a core enabler or a critical element of improvement interventions [6,[12][13][14][15].…”

Suicidal Behaviors in Patients Admitted to Emergency Department for Psychiatric Consultation: A Comparison of the Migrant and Native Italian Populations Between 2008 and 2015

“…Previous reports suggested that in the ED seting, where it is not possible to establish a post-acute therapeutic relationship with the migrant patient, it is likely that personality disorders are underestimated [52].…”