Good Practices and Results for the Implementation of a Framework of Sustainable Development in Higher Education

Moldovan, Liviu

doi:10.3390/proceedings2020063059

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 16 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…A general remark is that, even if the San-Q framework establishes some correspondence to the evaluation matrices of the DUQuE framework for the evaluation and improvement of quality and safety in European hospitals [ 80 ], there are differences between them as well as from the other frameworks used in healthcare, in principle by its objective which promotes sustainable development. Overall, it can be appreciated that the result of the pilot evaluation is in line with other results reported in literature that assess the sustainability of training organizations with the support of reference frameworks [ 78 , 81 ].…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 85%

An Innovative Framework for Sustainable Development in Healthcare: The Human Rights Assessment

Moldovan

Blaga

Moldovan

et al. 2022

IJERPH

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Healthcare providers are investing considerable resources for the development of quality management systems in hospitals. Contrary to these efforts, the number of tools that allow the evaluation of implementation efforts and the results of quality, security and sustainable development is quite limited. The purpose of the study is to develop a reference framework for quality and sustainable development in healthcare, Sanitary-Quality (San-Q) at the micro system level, which is compatible with applicable national and international standards in the field. The research method consisted of the study of literature, identification and analysis of good sustainability practices in healthcare, which allowed identification of the areas of the new San-Q framework: quality, economic, environmental, social, institutional and healthcare. These areas are incorporated into the core topics of social responsibility mentioned by ISO26000. A total of 57 indicators have been defined that make up the new reference framework. The evaluation format of the indicators is innovative through a couple of values: completion degree–significance. In the experimental part of the research, a pilot implementation of the San-Q framework at an emergency hospital was performed, the results recorded in terms of responsibility for human rights being presented. The conclusions of the study reveal the innovative aspects of the framework that facilitate the development of a sustainability strategy promoted through performance indicators, the results obtained after evaluation being useful in establishing a reference level of sustainability but also in developing sustainability policies.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 85%