2018
DOI: 10.2140/pjm.2018.295.145
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Good reduction and Shafarevich-type theorems for dynamical systems with portrait level structures

Abstract: Let K be a number field, let S be a finite set of places of K, and let R S be the ring of S-integers of K. A K-morphism f :We prove that for a fixed K, S, and d, there are only finitely many PGL 2 (R S )-equivalence classes of triples with deg(f ) = d and P ∈Y e f (P ) ≥ 2d+1 and X having good reduction outside S. We consider refined questions in which the weighted directed graph structure on f : Y → X is specified, and we give an exhaustive analysis for degree 2 maps on P 1 when Y = X.Our dynamical Shafarevic… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The following gives a strong Dynamical Shafarevich Theorem for P 1 with orbit points; see also earlier work of Szpiro-Tucker [227, (2008)], Szpiro-West [225, (2017)], and Petsche-Stout [183, (2015)]. [203,Proposition 11]. However, if one further specifies the exact orbit structure of the map f : Y → X, then some configurations with n = 2d permit infinitely many good reduction triples, while other configurations allow only finitely many.…”
Section: Good Reduction Of Maps and Orbitsmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The following gives a strong Dynamical Shafarevich Theorem for P 1 with orbit points; see also earlier work of Szpiro-Tucker [227, (2008)], Szpiro-West [225, (2017)], and Petsche-Stout [183, (2015)]. [203,Proposition 11]. However, if one further specifies the exact orbit structure of the map f : Y → X, then some configurations with n = 2d permit infinitely many good reduction triples, while other configurations allow only finitely many.…”
Section: Good Reduction Of Maps and Orbitsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…See[203] for details, as well as for a complete list of the values of ShafDim 1 2 [P] for the 35 portraits that contain at most 4 points and are allowable for degree 2 maps.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…R d,N [m](K, S) admits only finitely many PL N +1 (O S )-orbits. Theorem 1.6 recovers [8,Theorem 2] in the case N = 1, restricting the latter to triples (f, X, Y ) for which f has multiplicity 1 on Y . As in [8] we could allow multiplicities to be taken into account when N = 1, but there does not seem to be an appropriate higher dimensional analogue of this aspect that follows from our proof.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…It is easy to generalize this construction to higher dimensions, so that the most obvious dynamical counterpart of the Shafarevich conjecture fails for all choices of d, N, K, and S. In order to recover an appropriate statement, one must impose more structure on the space of maps. As has been done under various guises in [5], [6], [8], [9], and [10], we study pairs (f, X) consisting of a map f having good reduction outside S and an appropriate finite Gal(K/K)-invariant set X ⊆ P N (K) also having good reduction outside S. Naturally, we would expect X to be dynamically related to f -in particular, to have X = Y ∪ f (Y ) for some Y ⊆ P N (K)and for the points of X to lie in a certain kind of general position modulo reduction by all primes p / ∈ S.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation