Ruthenium(II) complexes [Ru(tap) 2 (NN)] 2+ (tap = 1,4,5,8-tetraazaphenanthrene, NN = 11-cyano-dipyrido[3,2-a:2′,3′-c]phenazine (11-CN-dppz) and 11,12-dicyano-dipyrido[3,2-a:2′,3′-c]phenazine (11,12-CN-dppz)) feature the C�N groups as infrared (IR)-active redox markers. They were studied by cyclic voltammetry, UV−vis, and IR spectroelectrochemistry (SEC), and density functional theory calculations to assign the four 1e − reduction waves R1−R4 observed in dichloromethane. Generally, the NN ligands are reduced first (R1). For [Ru(tap) 2 (11,12-CN-dppz)] 2+ , R1 is sufficiently separated from R2 and delocalized over both tap ligands. Accordingly, IR SEC conducted at R1 shows a large red shift of the ν s,as (C�N) modes by −18/−28 cm −1 , accompanied by a 4-fold enhancement of the ν s (C�N) intensity, comparably with reference data for free 11,12-CNdppz. The first tap-based reduction of spin-doublet [Ru(tap) 2 (11,12-CN-dppz)] + to spin-triplet [Ru(tap) 2 (11,12-CN-dppz)] at R2 decreased ν(C�N) by merely −2 cm −1 , while the intensity enhancement reached an overall factor of 8. Comparably, a red shift of ν(C�N) by −27 cm −1 resulted from the 1e − reduction of [Ru(tap) 2 (11-CN-dppz)] 2+ at R1 (poorly resolved from R2), and the intensity enhancement was roughly 3-fold. Concomitant 1e − reductions of the tap ligands (R2 and R3) caused only minor ν(C�N) shifts of −3 cm −1 and increased the absorbance by overall factors of 6.5 and 8, respectively.