2011
DOI: 10.1080/19312458.2011.624490
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Goodbye, Listwise Deletion: Presenting Hot Deck Imputation as an Easy and Effective Tool for Handling Missing Data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
249
0
5

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 392 publications
(264 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
249
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…A hot deck imputation method (Myers, 2011) was used to deal with missing data by replacing a missing item value of the recipient with a value of the matching donor within the same dataset. All hypotheses were tested with conditional process analysis (Hayes, 2013), using the PROCESS tool for SPSS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A hot deck imputation method (Myers, 2011) was used to deal with missing data by replacing a missing item value of the recipient with a value of the matching donor within the same dataset. All hypotheses were tested with conditional process analysis (Hayes, 2013), using the PROCESS tool for SPSS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hot deck method was used forreplacing missing value (Myers, 2011;Reilly, 1993). It was followed by the tests of normality, and exploratory factor analysis for preliminary results.…”
Section: Preliminary Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each wave had about 20% missing data because students were absent because of external internships, and sickness (n wave1 ¼ 792; 49% boys; n wave2 ¼ 740; 49% boys; n wave3 ¼ 762; 48% boys). Missing data were handled according to recent insights of hot-deck imputation [30]. Decks used to impute missing data were gender, age, and grade.…”
Section: Participants and Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%