1992
DOI: 10.2307/2111590
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Goodness-of-Fit Measures for Probit and Logit

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
128
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 215 publications
(132 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
3
128
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We ran 4 logistic regression models for each population network to determine how well patch area and isolation predicted occupancy: (i) area only, (ii) isolation only, (iii) area ϩ isolation, and (iv) area ϫ isolation (see Methods). The amount of deviance (i.e., variation) in occupancy explained by each model (pseudoR 2 , or pR 2 ) represents the ability of patch area and/or isolation to predict species occurrence patterns; this statistic is analogous to the R 2 of linear regression (9). The pR 2 values from each of the 1,015 population networks created distributions that were skewed toward 0, and few species were strongly influenced by patch area or isolation (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We ran 4 logistic regression models for each population network to determine how well patch area and isolation predicted occupancy: (i) area only, (ii) isolation only, (iii) area ϩ isolation, and (iv) area ϫ isolation (see Methods). The amount of deviance (i.e., variation) in occupancy explained by each model (pseudoR 2 , or pR 2 ) represents the ability of patch area and/or isolation to predict species occurrence patterns; this statistic is analogous to the R 2 of linear regression (9). The pR 2 values from each of the 1,015 population networks created distributions that were skewed toward 0, and few species were strongly influenced by patch area or isolation (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its sampling properties have been examined by simulation for the case in which the ordinal variable is dichotomous, and its performance compared quite favorably to that of several other pseudo-R 2 's (Hagle and Mitchell 1992). The simulations suggest it is a good estimate of the OLS R 2 associated with the continuous variable underlying the dichotomous variable in the simulations.…”
Section: Model With Measurement Errormentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This is of the 'explained variation class' of measures in that it mimics the standard R 2 in OLS since it can be interpreted as the ratio of explained sum of squares to the total sum of squares (Veall and Zimmermann, 1996). Simulations suggest that this measure most closely approximates the OLS R 2 for the underlying (unobserved) latent variable model (Hagle and Mitchell, 1992;Windmeijer, 1995) and hence it is an attractive choice. 17…”
Section: Ordinal Vs Cardinal Response Scale?mentioning
confidence: 99%