2018
DOI: 10.1002/cjs.11352
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Goodness‐of‐fit tests for Lévy‐driven Ornstein‐Uhlenbeck processes

Abstract: Lévy‐Driven Ornstein‐Uhlenbeck (or CAR(1)) processes have been introduced in the literature as a model for stochastic volatility. A general formula to recover the unobserved driving process from a continuously observed CAR(1) was developed. When the CAR(1) process is observed at discrete times, the driving process must be approximated. Approximated increments of the driving process are used to test the hypothesis that the CAR(1) belongs to a specified class of Lévy processes. Two goodness‐of‐fit tests are prop… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, there exists a family of Poisson processes N (j) t with elementwise intensity λ = (λ (1) , . .…”
Section: Finite Jump Activity Casementioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Indeed, there exists a family of Poisson processes N (j) t with elementwise intensity λ = (λ (1) , . .…”
Section: Finite Jump Activity Casementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Remark 5.3. The parametric bootstrap used in the following sections is supported by the theoretical guarantees presented in [48,1]: consistent parameter estimators for the driving Lévy noise distribution are enough to replicate the true dynamics of the GrOU process. Although those results are proved for distributions characterised by their first two moments [1, Th.…”
Section: Generalised Hyperbolic Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The Ornstein–Uhlenbeck (OU) process has a wide array of applications in modelling the stochastic dynamics of various processes in the natural and social sciences including those in the economic and financial markets; see Chen, Mamon & Davison () for a survey, and Abdelrazeq, Ivanoff & Kulik () for some recent statistical developments involving this process. The classical OU model typically assumes that the drift component remains the same for the entire modelling‐time horizon and thus, it may not perform well when the mean level of the process varies with time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%