2016
DOI: 10.1016/s2212-5671(16)00025-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Goods and Services Tax (GST) Compliance among Malaysian Consumers: The Influence of Price, Government Subsidies and Income Inequality

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Mohd Yusof et al (2014), very few studies on tax noncompliance in Malaysia have examined the factors that could lead to tax fraud or noncompliance, such as penalty rate, marginal tax rate, foreign ownership, financial liquidity, company size and industry type. As for studies on GST compliance, studies such as Ling et al (2016) examined GST compliance among Malaysian consumers. They found that the price of goods and services, government subsidies, and income inequality significantly affected GST compliance.…”
Section: Literature Review 21 Gstmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Mohd Yusof et al (2014), very few studies on tax noncompliance in Malaysia have examined the factors that could lead to tax fraud or noncompliance, such as penalty rate, marginal tax rate, foreign ownership, financial liquidity, company size and industry type. As for studies on GST compliance, studies such as Ling et al (2016) examined GST compliance among Malaysian consumers. They found that the price of goods and services, government subsidies, and income inequality significantly affected GST compliance.…”
Section: Literature Review 21 Gstmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The period of GST implementation by the Malaysian government combined with the diminishing value of the ringgit, sluggishness in commodity prices, and plunging crude oil prices seems to have had a great influence on the price variation of goods and services (Malaysian Institute of Economic Research, 2016). The implementation of GST is believed to negatively influence the purchasing power due to the high price charged for each product and service (Ling et al, 2016).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…VAT was first introduced by Germany and France in the form of a general consumption tax during World War I with France modernizing its implementation in the 1950s. Among the benefits of VAT are that it overcomes the issue of government income losses since the imposition of VAT means that all levels of transactions are taxed, and it is also considered as an effective way of generating revenue (Keen and Smith, 2006;Olatunji, 2009, Ling, Osman, Muhammad, Yeng, & Jin, 2016. To date, 160 countries in the world have implemented VAT/GST (Royal Malaysian Customs Department, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The government also makes its credit to uncertainty in the prediction of future retail prices, especially products in the FMCG market. As shown by Poterba (1996) and enhanced by Ling, Osman, Muhammad, Yeng, and Jin (2016), the increase in state taxes increases prices, but decrease -do not affect retail price. Even the Government's contemplation about increasing tax burden encourages an unpredictable increase in price dynamics.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 90%