2022
DOI: 10.1177/12063312221090601
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

“Google Is Not a Good Neighbor”: The Google Campus Protests in Berlin

Abstract: When Google announced, in October 2018, that it would not pursue its plan to open a Google Campus in Berlin-Kreuzberg, the local anti-gentrification protesters were triumphant. The retreat was widely seen to be the result of a 2-year-long fight between the tech company and local activist groups. Next to the usual gentrification issues, the protests had additionally addressed what Google as a company stands for and focused on their data policies and the underlying (economic) rationale. The article asks what rol… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 42 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Smart cities are often a top-down endeavor and due to their ostensibly technical nature are not always viewed by governments as a topic for debate in public settings. There are few well-studied cases of open political discussion about urban development projects that have smart city dimensions; examples are Toronto’s Quayside (Robinson and Coutts, 2019), New York’s Amazon HQ2 (Gupta, 2019), and Berlin-Kreuzberg’s Google Campus (Hartmann, 2022). Beyond such cases, whether smart cities become a more frequent topic of political debate—both among the public and in internal policy deliberations—is uncertain given increasingly vague conceptualizations (i.e., evolving narratives of “smartness” as an all-encompassing policy ideal) and given the rise of ever-newer technology paradigms and narratives (e.g., generative AI; see Guenduez and Mettler, 2023; af Malmborg and Trondal, 2023).…”
Section: Policy Implications and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Smart cities are often a top-down endeavor and due to their ostensibly technical nature are not always viewed by governments as a topic for debate in public settings. There are few well-studied cases of open political discussion about urban development projects that have smart city dimensions; examples are Toronto’s Quayside (Robinson and Coutts, 2019), New York’s Amazon HQ2 (Gupta, 2019), and Berlin-Kreuzberg’s Google Campus (Hartmann, 2022). Beyond such cases, whether smart cities become a more frequent topic of political debate—both among the public and in internal policy deliberations—is uncertain given increasingly vague conceptualizations (i.e., evolving narratives of “smartness” as an all-encompassing policy ideal) and given the rise of ever-newer technology paradigms and narratives (e.g., generative AI; see Guenduez and Mettler, 2023; af Malmborg and Trondal, 2023).…”
Section: Policy Implications and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%