2009
DOI: 10.1345/aph.1l223
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Google Scholar Versus PubMed in Locating Primary Literature to Answer Drug-Related Questions

Abstract: No significant differences were identified in the number of target primary literature articles located between databases. PubMed searches yielded fewer total citations than Google Scholar results; however, PubMed appears to be more specific than Google Scholar for locating relevant primary literature articles.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
34
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
3
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…ever, retrieval is always limited to the journals that PubMed indexes [1]. Google Scholar does not have this limitation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ever, retrieval is always limited to the journals that PubMed indexes [1]. Google Scholar does not have this limitation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[10][11][12] As a result, searching with MeSH terms either by themselves or in combination with keywords is often taught as the preferred PubMed search strategy in the education of many healthcare professionals. [13][14][15] The time interval between when an article is entered in PubMed and indexed with MeSH terms is estimated to be upwards of 4 months for some pharmacy journals which may present an obstacle for Publication type was determined by the NLM and reported as part of the Medline display format.…”
Section: -7mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dedicated online resources with clinical calculators and providers of aggregated medical information were used (UpToDate, Merck/Univadis, and Medscape) [12][13][14]. Names of available clinical calculators were extracted.…”
Section: Data Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%