2016
DOI: 10.1080/15367967.2016.1154465
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

GoPro as an ethnographic tool: A wayfinding study in an academic library

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In other words, I wanted to be able to focus on the decisions they made, the photos they decided to take, and their explanations of what was important in this exercise. This can be contrasted with methods where researchers are present (e.g., Haberl & Wortman, 2012) or where video cameras are used to document participants' every move (e.g., Kinsley, Schoonover, & Spitler, 2016). By handing them the camera and allowing them to work through the tasks and space on their own, I was asking participants to independently decide what was important, what they wanted to photograph, to show and talk about.…”
Section: Method: Participant-driven Photo-elicitationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, I wanted to be able to focus on the decisions they made, the photos they decided to take, and their explanations of what was important in this exercise. This can be contrasted with methods where researchers are present (e.g., Haberl & Wortman, 2012) or where video cameras are used to document participants' every move (e.g., Kinsley, Schoonover, & Spitler, 2016). By handing them the camera and allowing them to work through the tasks and space on their own, I was asking participants to independently decide what was important, what they wanted to photograph, to show and talk about.…”
Section: Method: Participant-driven Photo-elicitationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kato and Takeuchi (2003) also advocate for the enriching role of taxonomies created from collected verbal data and the details proffered by think aloud transcripts. Kinsley, Schoonover, and Spitler (2016) use Go/Pro cameras and think aloud protocol in conjunction with survey and mapping to help pinpoint wayfinding trouble spots in an academic library. Consciously building on the work of Larsen and Tatarka (2008) and Hahn and Zitron (2011), Kinsley et al (2016) describe a cost effective, multi-method approach to identify specific decision and failure points in library wayfinding.…”
Section: Wayfinding Research Using the Think Aloud Protocolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kinsley, Schoonover, and Spitler (2016) use Go/Pro cameras and think aloud protocol in conjunction with survey and mapping to help pinpoint wayfinding trouble spots in an academic library. Consciously building on the work of Larsen and Tatarka (2008) and Hahn and Zitron (2011), Kinsley et al (2016) describe a cost effective, multi-method approach to identify specific decision and failure points in library wayfinding. Larsen and Tatarka (2008) ask participants to think aloud in a study investigating the efficacy of the implementation of recommendations resulting from a prior wayfinding study.…”
Section: Wayfinding Research Using the Think Aloud Protocolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers continue to adopt and develop inventive uses of ethnography in library settings, whether as a method, as in Dunne's (2016) shadowing of several students during the final weeks of their undergraduate studies and Kinsley, Schoonover, and Spitler's (2016) use of GoPro cameras to learn about students' processes of finding books in library stacks, or as pedagogical inspiration, as in Pashia and Critten's (2015) use of mapping and observation in library orientation sessions. Recent studies with implications for the research at hand include Holder and Lange's (2014) mixedmethods examination of library space and patron satisfaction, Allan's (2016) analysis of student awareness of librarians' roles within a learning commons setting, and Khoo, Rozaklis, Hall, and Kusunoki's (2016) surveys of student perception and usage of library space.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%