2016
DOI: 10.1007/s11425-015-0798-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gorenstein dimensions of unbounded complexes and change of base (with an appendix by Driss Bennis)

Abstract: For a commutative ring R and a faithfully flat R-algebra S we prove, under mild extra assumptions, that an R-module M is Gorenstein flat if and only if the left S-module S ⊗ R M is Gorenstein flat, and that an R-module N is Gorenstein injective if and only if it is cotorsion and the left S-module Hom R (S, N ) is Gorenstein injective. We apply these results to the study of Gorenstein homological dimensions of unbounded complexes. In particular, we prove two theorems on stability of these dimensions under faith… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(23 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For an R-complex N and i ∈ Z set Ext i FC (M, N ) = H −i (Hom R (T, N )) . For a complex of finite Gorenstein flat dimension, every complete flat-cotorsion resolution is per the next lemma a Tate flat resolution in the sense of [19,7].…”
Section: An Illustration: Tate Cohomologymentioning
confidence: 97%
“…For an R-complex N and i ∈ Z set Ext i FC (M, N ) = H −i (Hom R (T, N )) . For a complex of finite Gorenstein flat dimension, every complete flat-cotorsion resolution is per the next lemma a Tate flat resolution in the sense of [19,7].…”
Section: An Illustration: Tate Cohomologymentioning
confidence: 97%
“…A (F, G) = 0 holds this sequence splits, which means that F is a summand of I and hence injective. This argument can be souped up to yield the next theorem, which is dual to [7, Theorem 1.1] and subsumes [18,Theorem 2.1] Recall, for example from [8,Proposition 3.6], that the Gorenstein injective dimension of an A-complex M can be defined as the least integer n such that (1) H v (M ) = 0 holds for all v < −n and (2) there exists a semi-injective A-complex I, isomorphic to M in the derived category, such that the cycle submodule Z −n (I) is Gorenstein injective.…”
Section: Dimension Shifting Yields Extmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let M be an A ‐complex with prefixGfdAM=d for some integer d . Let PM be a semi‐projective resolution; the module C=prefixCd(P) is Gorenstein flat, see Christensen, Köksal, and Liang [9, Prop. 5.12] 1 , and it suffices to show that prefixGpdACn holds, as this implies that prefixCd+n(P) is Gorenstein projective.…”
Section: Comparing Gorenstein Global Dimensionsmentioning
confidence: 99%