2009
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-10-48
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

GOrilla: a tool for discovery and visualization of enriched GO terms in ranked gene lists

Abstract: BackgroundSince the inception of the GO annotation project, a variety of tools have been developed that support exploring and searching the GO database. In particular, a variety of tools that perform GO enrichment analysis are currently available. Most of these tools require as input a target set of genes and a background set and seek enrichment in the target set compared to the background set. A few tools also exist that support analyzing ranked lists. The latter typically rely on simulations or on union-boun… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

23
3,065
1
10

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3,162 publications
(3,099 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
23
3,065
1
10
Order By: Relevance
“…Gene Ontology enrichment analysis was performed on ranked list of proteins using log‐transformed P ‐values or specificity scores using GOrilla (Eden et al , 2009) followed by GO term redundancy reduction performed by REVIGO (Supek et al , 2011). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gene Ontology enrichment analysis was performed on ranked list of proteins using log‐transformed P ‐values or specificity scores using GOrilla (Eden et al , 2009) followed by GO term redundancy reduction performed by REVIGO (Supek et al , 2011). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Perform GO analysis with Gorilla; select significant networks (P < 0.03) for further analysis (Bauer et al, 2008;Eden et al, 2009). Functional classification of selected genes can be viewed in pie chart with Panther (Mi et al, 2016).…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Expression changes more than 2-fold and b-value differences more than 0.2 were considered significant. The gene ontology term analysis was performed using GREAT, 40 Gorilla, 41 and WebGestalt 42 tools. 3D principal component analyses (ellipsoids) of the expression data were constructed on the basis of the covariance matrix with 2 standard deviation scaling.…”
Section: Reprogrammingmentioning
confidence: 99%