2011 IEEE Consumer Communications and Networking Conference (CCNC) 2011
DOI: 10.1109/ccnc.2011.5766539
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gossip-based asynchronous and robust aggregation protocol — A pessimistic approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
1
1
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…the calculation of standard deviation and root mean squared error over a number of buffered estimates are used as a criterion in the detection formulas. The work in [12] proposes a pessimistic approach and introduces a recovery mechanism which conserves the system mass in the presence of asynchrony and churn. This approach applies asynchrony to the work of [1] enabling loosely synchronised rounds.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the calculation of standard deviation and root mean squared error over a number of buffered estimates are used as a criterion in the detection formulas. The work in [12] proposes a pessimistic approach and introduces a recovery mechanism which conserves the system mass in the presence of asynchrony and churn. This approach applies asynchrony to the work of [1] enabling loosely synchronised rounds.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each node starts the randomised communication at the beginning of each cycle. Cycles are time intervals of fixed length and the length is equivalent to the average Round-Trip-Time (RTT ) of the Internet [23,24]. The start of the first cycle at each node is uniformly distributed within a bound offset T start equivalent to maximum drifts among internal clocks in network nodes.…”
Section: Distributed System Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apparently, in order to guarantee the mass conservation invariant, the only requirement would be that the two messages (push and pull) are both successfully received within the current Gossip cycle. However, in [26,27] it has been pointed out that this is not the case. In order to conserve the global mass and to guarantee a convergence to the true aggregate value, the two messages used to exchange the local values must be sent and received in an atomic communication operation.…”
Section: Push-pull Gossip Protocolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to conserve the global mass and to guarantee a convergence to the true aggregate value, the two messages used to exchange the local values must be sent and received in an atomic communication operation. This requirement imposes additional complexity in practical implementations and introduces dependability issues [26,27] in real asynchronous environments.…”
Section: Push-pull Gossip Protocolmentioning
confidence: 99%