Proceedings of the 10th ACM Symposium on Modeling, Analysis, and Simulation of Wireless and Mobile Systems 2007
DOI: 10.1145/1298126.1298189
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gossiping using the energy map in wireless sensor networks

Abstract: A gossip protocol randomly decides the set of nodes that will forward a packet it received. Gossiping was proposed to be used in dynamic topology networks such as Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs). This work proposes Gossiping using the Energy Map (GEM), a new gossiping-based protocol to perform energy-aware broadcasting in WSNs. The key idea is to change the random selection of neighbors in a way that the selection process uses the energy map. In our protocol, the routing flow is directed to the nodes with the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this way, the constraint is defined as: γ=1false|Ωitafalse|, where false|normalΩitafalse| counts the number of nodes i in a given solution normalΩita. Energy constraint:This restriction attempts to prioritize solutions with lower energy consumption. In order to measure energy consumption, the nodes' energy coefficient, as defined in the study of Val Machado et al, is considered. This is expressed as Coe=ei+1nei+1truej=ineiej, where e is the energy level of the node, and nei is the number of neighbors of the i th node.…”
Section: The Proposed Automatic Provisioning Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this way, the constraint is defined as: γ=1false|Ωitafalse|, where false|normalΩitafalse| counts the number of nodes i in a given solution normalΩita. Energy constraint:This restriction attempts to prioritize solutions with lower energy consumption. In order to measure energy consumption, the nodes' energy coefficient, as defined in the study of Val Machado et al, is considered. This is expressed as Coe=ei+1nei+1truej=ineiej, where e is the energy level of the node, and nei is the number of neighbors of the i th node.…”
Section: The Proposed Automatic Provisioning Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This restriction attempts to prioritize solutions with lower energy consumption. In order to measure energy consumption, the nodes' energy coefficient, as defined in the study of Val Machado et al, is considered. This is expressed as Coe=ei+1nei+1truej=ineiej, where e is the energy level of the node, and nei is the number of neighbors of the i th node.…”
Section: The Proposed Automatic Provisioning Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the use of the same network wide rebroadcast probability for all nodes is not efficient, and the rebroadcast redundancy is high. Some improvements have been proposed to determine the rebroadcast probability based on the density of local neighbors 7–9 or based on the number of received message copies 3, 10 to reduce rebroadcast redundancy and increase broadcast coverage; and some other improvements include using energy‐aware gossiping probability for network lifetime maximization 11 or employing local reception confirmation message for high broadcast reliability 12, 13. These variations normally require the exchange of neighbor information.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%