2017
DOI: 10.1332/175982717x14877669275128
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

‘Got a degree…all of a sudden I'm in a Jobcentre’: The role of ‘stigma’ in ‘precarious’ graduate transitions

Abstract: There is widespread evidence that those claiming out-of-work benefits experience different types of ‘benefit stigma’ in the UK, with the focus largely falling on conventionally disadvantaged welfare users. In contrast, graduates’ experiences of ‘benefits stigma’ go unnoticed because of their relative advantage within the labour market. Yet, an increase in precarity across the labour market has unsettled graduate transitions and is re-shaping their relationships with out-of-work benefits. Against this backdrop,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Employment for modern university graduates increasingly involves intricate patterns of physical and virtual movement based on complex spatio-temporal arrangements (Dorow, Roseman & Cresswell 2016). More and more it demands non-standard, precarious working arrangements (Formby 2017) grounded in the micro-geographies of household dynamics, the daily commute, and the power-geometries of class, race, gender, dis/ability, and age (Massey 2012). Whilst employment mobilities certainly involve the capacity to secure better work prospects appropriate to levels of skill and qualification, they also go beyond this in constituting a new space of identification and belonging (Robertson et al 2018).…”
Section: Employment Mobilities and Materialitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Employment for modern university graduates increasingly involves intricate patterns of physical and virtual movement based on complex spatio-temporal arrangements (Dorow, Roseman & Cresswell 2016). More and more it demands non-standard, precarious working arrangements (Formby 2017) grounded in the micro-geographies of household dynamics, the daily commute, and the power-geometries of class, race, gender, dis/ability, and age (Massey 2012). Whilst employment mobilities certainly involve the capacity to secure better work prospects appropriate to levels of skill and qualification, they also go beyond this in constituting a new space of identification and belonging (Robertson et al 2018).…”
Section: Employment Mobilities and Materialitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By 2011, over one million young people were unemployed (ONS, 2011: 10) -21.7 per cent of all young people. This impacted all groups -even those not usually associated with labour market insecurity -as one in five graduates also became unemployed (Office for National Statistics, 2011;MacDonald, 2011;Formby, 2014;Formby, 2017). In the ten years since the Great Recession, young people have continued to experience substantial difficulties in the labour market.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…
In recent years, the association between youth and precarity has become increasingly strengthened. Most commonly, youth precarity has been linked to the labour market (Shildrick et al, 2010;Crisp and Powell, 2017;Formby, 2017) and the housing market (McKee et al, 2020) although other social strata such as precarity of place (Banki, 2013) and precarious leisure (Batchelor et al, 2020) have also received attention. Deindustrialisation, forceful neoliberal politics, the global financial crisis (GFC) of 2008, austerity measures and, most likely now, the social and economic costs of the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic have accelerated academic attention on young people with concern over how they are faring amid a complex web of unpredictable and insecure social structures and what consequences these will have for their futures.
…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%