2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2022.122016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gotham city. Predicting ‘corrupted’ municipalities with machine learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is problematic because 95.35% of firms will be correctly identified when firms are always predicted not to be politically connected. To prevent the algorithms to achieve high accuracy by always predicting the most common group, we follow the literature on corruption prediction (de Blasio et al ., 2020) and use the synthetic minority oversampling technique (SMOTE) (Chawla et al ., 2002). This technique essentially randomly undersamples the majority class, that is, not politically connected firms.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is problematic because 95.35% of firms will be correctly identified when firms are always predicted not to be politically connected. To prevent the algorithms to achieve high accuracy by always predicting the most common group, we follow the literature on corruption prediction (de Blasio et al ., 2020) and use the synthetic minority oversampling technique (SMOTE) (Chawla et al ., 2002). This technique essentially randomly undersamples the majority class, that is, not politically connected firms.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lopez‐Iturriaga (2018) use the information on criminal cases involving a politician or a public official to estimate corruption risk for Spanish provinces. At a more local level, de Blasio, D'Ignazio, and Letta (2020) and Ash, Galletta, and Giommoni (2020) predict corruption crimes in Italian and Brazilian municipalities, respectively. Other studies have used more detailed, contract‐level data, to detect corruption in public procurement in Colombia (Gallego, Rivero, and Martinez, 2021) and in Italy (Decarolis and Giorgiantonio, 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meanwhile, using police archives [19], deploy machine learning algorithms to predict corruption crimes in Italian municipalities from 2012-2014. Over 70% of municipalities that will have corruption incidents have been correctly identified by the study.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over 70% of municipalities that will have corruption incidents have been correctly identified by the study. In line with [14], [17]- [19] aims to develop a robust predictive machine learning model on local-government corruption in Brazil. This study used budget accounts data of Brazilian municipalities from 2003 to 2010.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…De modo semelhante, este índice foi explorado por Domashova e Politova (2021), que aplicaram técnicas de clusterização e classificação para identificar os sinais e causas principais no CPI. Cita-se, ainda, a pesquisa de Li et al (2020), que aplicaram métodos de Processamento de Linguagem Natural (PLN) e técnicas de aprendizagem não supervisionada para detectar autodeclaração de experiências com corrupção no Twitter, enquanto o trabalho publicado por De Blasio et al (2022), em que aplicaram algoritmos para predizer crimes de corrupção em municípios italianos com dados de 2011. Percebe-se, portanto, que existem diferentes formas de se explorar dados sobre corrupção, mas poucos trabalhos aplicaram algoritmos de classificação neste contexto, com nenhum deles explorando diretamente agentes públicos.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified