2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.shpsc.2013.05.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gould talking past Dawkins on the unit of selection issue

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 7 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Aggregate formation may represent a step toward the creation of a new level of selection. Defining a level of selection is not without controversy (Istvan Jr 2013), but in general a unit of selection is accepted as a biological level of organization upon which natural selection acts (Hull 2001;Okasha 2006;Wade et al 2010). Aggregates meet this definition, because after vortexing, large fragments of the aggregate either survive or perish as a unit.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aggregate formation may represent a step toward the creation of a new level of selection. Defining a level of selection is not without controversy (Istvan Jr 2013), but in general a unit of selection is accepted as a biological level of organization upon which natural selection acts (Hull 2001;Okasha 2006;Wade et al 2010). Aggregates meet this definition, because after vortexing, large fragments of the aggregate either survive or perish as a unit.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%