2013
DOI: 10.14763/2013.3.188
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Governance by algorithms

Abstract: Algorithms are increasingly often cited as one of the fundamental shaping devices of our daily, immersed-in-information existence. Their importance is acknowledged, their performance scrutinised in numerous contexts. Yet, a lot of what constitutes 'algorithms' beyond their broad definition as "encoded procedures for transforming input data into a desired output, based on specified calculations" (Gillespie, 2013) is often taken for granted. This article seeks to contribute to the discussion about 'what algorith… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
41
0
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
41
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This is the same for systems designed to empower, entertain and enlighten, as they are also predicated on defined rule-sets about how a system behaves at any one time and situation. Algorithms thus claim and express algorithmic authority (Shirky, 2009) or algorithmic governance (Beer, 2009;Musiani, 2013), often through what Dodge and Kitchin (2007) term 'automated management' (decision-making processes that are automated, automatic and autonomous; outside of human oversight). The consequence for Lash (2007) is that society now has a new rule set to live by to complement constitutive and regulative rules: algorithmic, generative rules.…”
Section: Thinking Critically About Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is the same for systems designed to empower, entertain and enlighten, as they are also predicated on defined rule-sets about how a system behaves at any one time and situation. Algorithms thus claim and express algorithmic authority (Shirky, 2009) or algorithmic governance (Beer, 2009;Musiani, 2013), often through what Dodge and Kitchin (2007) term 'automated management' (decision-making processes that are automated, automatic and autonomous; outside of human oversight). The consequence for Lash (2007) is that society now has a new rule set to live by to complement constitutive and regulative rules: algorithmic, generative rules.…”
Section: Thinking Critically About Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…29 This suppresses or regulates certain actors and more generally shapes global publics. 30 Searching, as a practice, increasingly shapes how we experience our world, naturalizing results while concealing the influence of coders on them. 31 The search results it displays appear beside the tailored ads it generates, providing a commercial tone to this public.…”
Section: Big Data Objects and Global Governancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…32 Amazon's algorithms that shape reading preferences play a similar role. 33 Reputational ranking systems such as those associated with eBay, 34 hotels.com, or AirBnB combine user responses with algorithmic regulation. 35 The above examples of algorithmic regulation all involve the control of flows of information and suggest more direct automated regulation of physical objects and human bodies, although this is only in the early stages.…”
Section: Big Data Objects and Global Governancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In virtue of their technical skills, code developers, miners, fintech professionals and technopreneurs would easily have a privileged position in society, becoming the new policy makers to detriment of a big mass of computer illiterate or low skilled individuals, reduced to mere passive recipients of services. Elites can assume many forms according to the social and political context, and we are in a phase of human development where the power to develop codes and select algorithms has -and it will increasingly have -major implications in contemporary society: this power entails "assertion of authority" (Musiani, 2013) and it constitutes "politics pursued by other means" (Latour 1988, p. 229;Musiani, 2013), calling into question the egalitarian nature of technology and networks. Regrettably, indeed, open source does not automatically mean neither equal opportunity, nor inclusiveness.…”
Section: The Emerging Of New Hierarchies: the Blockchain Governance Omentioning
confidence: 99%